Evaluating usability in digital humanities features for archival retrieval systems

Abstract This study examines user perceptions of archival retrieval system functionality and interface design within the context of digital humanities research. Task-based user observations were conducted, with comprehensive recordings of participants’ interactions on archival retrieval systems, complemented by usability questionnaires to capture user experience and identify specific usability issues. Findings show that, despite recognizing the value of digital humanities analytical features, participants found the systems’ interfaces, functions, and terminology unintuitive. Overreliance on dropdown menus, insufficient guidance, and difficulties navigating hierarchical structures led to errors and trial-and-error behavior, hindering engagement and full system use. The study concludes with practical recommendations to improve the usability of archival retrieval systems integrating digital humanities analytical features.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archival Science
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-026-09536-x
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating usability in digital humanities features for archival retrieval systems

Yu-Ting Huang, Chiao-Min Lin
Archival Science
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Evaluating usability in digital humanities features for archival retrieval systems

Yu-Ting Huang, Chiao-Min Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines user perceptions of archival retrieval system functionality and interface design within the context of digital humanities research. Task-based user observations were conducted, with comprehensive recordings of participants’ interactions on archival retrieval systems, complemented by usability questionnaires to capture user experience and identify specific usability issues. Findings show that, despite recognizing the value of digital humanities analytical features, participants found the systems’ interfaces, functions, and terminology unintuitive. Overreliance on dropdown menus, insufficient guidance, and difficulties navigating hierarchical structures led to errors and trial-and-error behavior, hindering engagement and full system use. The study concludes with practical recommendations to improve the usability of archival retrieval systems integrating digital humanities analytical features.

Archival ScienceVol. 26(2)
National Science and Technology Council, National Chengchi University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.