Performance of New Roche Cobas Pulse Glucose Meter Against Potential Interfering Substances and Hematocrit Variations

Background: Point-of-care (POC) glucometers are essential for rapid blood glucose monitoring but are subject to interference and hematocrit variations. This study evaluated the analytical performance of the new Cobas Pulse glucometer against the Accu-Chek Inform II meter in the presence of N-acetylcysteine (NAC, 0.32–2.5 mmol/L), ascorbic acid (0.28–2.84 mmol/L), D-galactose (5.5–27 mmol/L), hemolysis (0.5–5 g/L hemoglobin), icterus (200–1600 μmol/L bilirubin), lipemia (2.5–15 g/L Intralipid), and hematocrit variations (20–60%). Methods: Interference testing followed CLSI EP07 guidelines using three whole blood pools with low (2.0–2.7 mmol/L), medium (4.5–7.4 mmol/L), and high (16.3–23 mmol/L) glucose levels. Interferents were spiked into these whole blood pools. Duplicate glucose levels were measured by 2 Pulse meters and 2 Inform II meters. The results were then assessed using the international standards, e.g., ISO 15197:2017 criteria (±15% or ±0.83 mmol/L). Results: Accu-Chek Inform II showed severe positive interference from galactose (up to 446.3%, p < 0.001), ascorbic acid (up to 98.8%, p = 0.002), and NAC (up to 61.4%, p = 0.001), exceeding ISO limits. Cobas Pulse demonstrated minimal interference (maximum biases: −3.7% for galactose, −4.4% for ascorbic acid, 7.7% for NAC, all p > 0.05). Both meters showed similar hematocrit-dependent bias (positive at 20–30%, negative at 50–60%) and acceptable performance for hemolysis, icterus (≤800 μmol/L), and lipemia. Conclusions: Compared to the Accu-Chek Inform II, the Cobas Pulse demonstrated greater resilience to interferences. Cobas Pulse meets strict accuracy standards (±10% for hospital use) with low interference, which makes it suitable for care of critically ill patients. The Cobas Pulse is more dependable for POCT across various clinical situations, supporting its role in critical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16091383
Primary Topic
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of New Roche Cobas Pulse Glucose Meter Against Potential Interfering Substances and Hematocrit Variations

Yu Chen, Mokarrameh Pudineh Moarref, Wanda Black
Diagnostics
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
article

Performance of New Roche Cobas Pulse Glucose Meter Against Potential Interfering Substances and Hematocrit Variations

Yu Chen, Mokarrameh Pudineh Moarref, Wanda Black
article en

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care (POC) glucometers are essential for rapid blood glucose monitoring but are subject to interference and hematocrit variations. This study evaluated the analytical performance of the new Cobas Pulse glucometer against the Accu-Chek Inform II meter in the presence of N-acetylcysteine (NAC, 0.32–2.5 mmol/L), ascorbic acid (0.28–2.84 mmol/L), D-galactose (5.5–27 mmol/L), hemolysis (0.5–5 g/L hemoglobin), icterus (200–1600 μmol/L bilirubin), lipemia (2.5–15 g/L Intralipid), and hematocrit variations (20–60%). Methods: Interference testing followed CLSI EP07 guidelines using three whole blood pools with low (2.0–2.7 mmol/L), medium (4.5–7.4 mmol/L), and high (16.3–23 mmol/L) glucose levels. Interferents were spiked into these whole blood pools. Duplicate glucose levels were measured by 2 Pulse meters and 2 Inform II meters. The results were then assessed using the international standards, e.g., ISO 15197:2017 criteria (±15% or ±0.83 mmol/L). Results: Accu-Chek Inform II showed severe positive interference from galactose (up to 446.3%, p < 0.001), ascorbic acid (up to 98.8%, p = 0.002), and NAC (up to 61.4%, p = 0.001), exceeding ISO limits. Cobas Pulse demonstrated minimal interference (maximum biases: −3.7% for galactose, −4.4% for ascorbic acid, 7.7% for NAC, all p > 0.05). Both meters showed similar hematocrit-dependent bias (positive at 20–30%, negative at 50–60%) and acceptable performance for hemolysis, icterus (≤800 μmol/L), and lipemia. Conclusions: Compared to the Accu-Chek Inform II, the Cobas Pulse demonstrated greater resilience to interferences. Cobas Pulse meets strict accuracy standards (±10% for hospital use) with low interference, which makes it suitable for care of critically ill patients. The Cobas Pulse is more dependable for POCT across various clinical situations, supporting its role in critical care.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(9)
Dalhousie University (CA), Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital (CA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.