Proportion and reasons for clozapine discontinuation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT Background and Hypothesis Clozapine is the only recommended medication for treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Understanding reasons for clozapine discontinuation is important, as once clozapine is stopped, treatment options are limited. Study Design We conducted a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of observational studies to identify the prevalence of clozapine discontinuation and to identify reasons for clozapine discontinuation. We systematically searched PubMed and Scopus databases from 1988 until November 2025. We included English language observational studies which reported on clozapine treated cases and reasons for clozapine discontinuation. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality Assessment Tool. Study Results Forty-five studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled proportion of clozapine discontinuation was 34% (95% CI: 29–40%, n=8136, 41 studies (n=22323), I2=98.43%). The pooled proportion of discontinuation in the total population due to non-adherence (all reasons) was 11% (95% CI: 8-16%, n=1418, 34 studies, I2=97.27%); side effects 11% (95% CI: 8-13%, n=2754, 40 studies, I2=96.12%); and ineffectiveness, 7% (95% CI: 5-9%, n=1355, 31 studies, I2=96.26%). Conclusion The most common reasons for clozapine discontinuation are non-adherence and side effects. By identifying and addressing these issues, clozapine continuation and thus clinical outcomes can be optimised. Lack of consistency in reporting reasons for discontinuation may indicate incomplete representation of reasons and could affect the findings of our study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgag016
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proportion and reasons for clozapine discontinuation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Paul McLaughlin, Oisín Conaty, Fiona Gaughran, Brian O’ Donoghue et al.
Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Proportion and reasons for clozapine discontinuation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Paul McLaughlin, Oisín Conaty, Fiona Gaughran, Brian O’ Donoghue, Róisín McManus, John Lally, Faisal Al-Harbi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Hypothesis Clozapine is the only recommended medication for treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Understanding reasons for clozapine discontinuation is important, as once clozapine is stopped, treatment options are limited. Study Design We conducted a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of observational studies to identify the prevalence of clozapine discontinuation and to identify reasons for clozapine discontinuation. We systematically searched PubMed and Scopus databases from 1988 until November 2025. We included English language observational studies which reported on clozapine treated cases and reasons for clozapine discontinuation. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality Assessment Tool. Study Results Forty-five studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled proportion of clozapine discontinuation was 34% (95% CI: 29–40%, n=8136, 41 studies (n=22323), I2=98.43%). The pooled proportion of discontinuation in the total population due to non-adherence (all reasons) was 11% (95% CI: 8-16%, n=1418, 34 studies, I2=97.27%); side effects 11% (95% CI: 8-13%, n=2754, 40 studies, I2=96.12%); and ineffectiveness, 7% (95% CI: 5-9%, n=1355, 31 studies, I2=96.26%). Conclusion The most common reasons for clozapine discontinuation are non-adherence and side effects. By identifying and addressing these issues, clozapine continuation and thus clinical outcomes can be optimised. Lack of consistency in reporting reasons for discontinuation may indicate incomplete representation of reasons and could affect the findings of our study.

Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
University College Dublin (IE), King's College London (GB), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB), St. Vincent's University Hospital (IE), St John of God Hospital (AU), Early Intervention Foundation (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.