Clinical Validity of NETest2.0® in Surveillance of Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Evidence from a NET Registry Study (NCT02270567)

Background/Objectives: The NETest is a blood-based, machine learning-enhanced multigene transcript assay designed to detect and monitor neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study evaluated the accuracy of the recently validated NETest2.0® (2025) to (1) detect the presence of disease and (2) assess its utility as a clinically meaningful tool for monitoring NET status across diverse patient cohorts, including post-surgical surveillance, observation (“watch-and-wait”), and treatment settings. Methods: This registry study (NCT02270567) evaluated two objectives. For Objective 1, 1290 samples from 886 patients, of which 404 had paired follow-up samples, were analyzed for concordance between NETest2.0® and imaging-detectable disease. For Objective 2, paired blood samples (n = 404; median interval 7 months [IQR 4–13.8]) from NET patients across specialized centers were assessed. NETest2.0® scores were correlated with clinically adjudicated disease status using imaging as the comparator. Cohorts included post-surgical residual disease detection (n = 71), post-surgical recurrence monitoring (n = 44), observation (n = 72), and treatment monitoring (n = 217; somatostatin analogs, PRRT, and other therapies). Analyses were performed by cohort and in aggregate. Results: For Objective 1, NETest2.0® (cut-off ≥ 50) demonstrated an AUC of 0.96, sensitivity of 91.9%, specificity of 94.9%, PPV of 98.4%, NPV of 77.1%, and overall accuracy of 92.5%. Performance was consistent across tumor grades and sites. For Objective 2, 286 patients (70.8%) were stable, and 118 (29.2%) had progression or recurrence. NETest2.0® score changes correlated significantly with outcomes: scores decreased in stable patients (median −14.6%) and increased in progressive disease (median + 15.4%; p < 0.0001). Any increase (>0%) in score was associated with progression. Diagnostic performance for detecting progression reached a sensitivity of 78.0%, specificity of 98.3%, PPV of 91.1%, NPV of 90.2%, and accuracy of 83.9%. Conclusions: NETest2.0® accurately detects disease and provides a clinically actionable tool for monitoring NETs. Its high specificity and predictive performance support risk-adapted surveillance, potentially reducing unnecessary imaging while identifying early progression across diverse clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18091457
Primary Topic
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Validity of NETest2.0® in Surveillance of Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Evidence from a NET Registry Study (NCT02270567)

Daniel M. Halperin, David K. Imagawa, Kiarash Mashayekhi, Abdel Halim et al.
Cancers
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
article

Clinical Validity of NETest2.0® in Surveillance of Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Evidence from a NET Registry Study (NCT02270567)

Daniel M. Halperin, David K. Imagawa, Kiarash Mashayekhi, Abdel Halim, Anthony Gulati, Diane Reidy
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The NETest is a blood-based, machine learning-enhanced multigene transcript assay designed to detect and monitor neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study evaluated the accuracy of the recently validated NETest2.0® (2025) to (1) detect the presence of disease and (2) assess its utility as a clinically meaningful tool for monitoring NET status across diverse patient cohorts, including post-surgical surveillance, observation (“watch-and-wait”), and treatment settings. Methods: This registry study (NCT02270567) evaluated two objectives. For Objective 1, 1290 samples from 886 patients, of which 404 had paired follow-up samples, were analyzed for concordance between NETest2.0® and imaging-detectable disease. For Objective 2, paired blood samples (n = 404; median interval 7 months [IQR 4–13.8]) from NET patients across specialized centers were assessed. NETest2.0® scores were correlated with clinically adjudicated disease status using imaging as the comparator. Cohorts included post-surgical residual disease detection (n = 71), post-surgical recurrence monitoring (n = 44), observation (n = 72), and treatment monitoring (n = 217; somatostatin analogs, PRRT, and other therapies). Analyses were performed by cohort and in aggregate. Results: For Objective 1, NETest2.0® (cut-off ≥ 50) demonstrated an AUC of 0.96, sensitivity of 91.9%, specificity of 94.9%, PPV of 98.4%, NPV of 77.1%, and overall accuracy of 92.5%. Performance was consistent across tumor grades and sites. For Objective 2, 286 patients (70.8%) were stable, and 118 (29.2%) had progression or recurrence. NETest2.0® score changes correlated significantly with outcomes: scores decreased in stable patients (median −14.6%) and increased in progressive disease (median + 15.4%; p < 0.0001). Any increase (>0%) in score was associated with progression. Diagnostic performance for detecting progression reached a sensitivity of 78.0%, specificity of 98.3%, PPV of 91.1%, NPV of 90.2%, and accuracy of 83.9%. Conclusions: NETest2.0® accurately detects disease and provides a clinically actionable tool for monitoring NETs. Its high specificity and predictive performance support risk-adapted surveillance, potentially reducing unnecessary imaging while identifying early progression across diverse clinical settings.

CancersVol. 18(9)
Emory University (US), University of North Dakota (US), Stamford Hospital (US), University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Wren Laboratories (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.