Laying Waste: Pre‐Emption, Dispossession, and Deputization in Colonial British Columbia

ABSTRACT Pre‐emption, a legal instrument allowing settlers to acquire Indigenous land via occupation and improvement, is a vital means of colonial dispossession in North America, yet has received relatively little critical attention. Our analysis outlines its significance, shedding new light on the way in which private property power and state authority worked together to shore up colonial jurisdiction, title, and sovereignty in British Columbia. Pre‐emption enrolled “private” actors in sustained forms of ongoing dispossession, removing the Indigenous presence from the land. Pre‐emption created the conditions for violence that was “illegal” on the face of the legislation yet was effectively granted impunity by colonial authorities. That pre‐emption was designed to take place on unsurveyed land and to the exclusion of “Indian settlements” empowered settlers to self‐administer and regulate the appropriation of land, and to define what was open for settlement and what was not, shaping the (il)legal practices of land appropriation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70162
Primary Topic
Canadian Identity and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laying Waste: Pre‐Emption, Dispossession, and Deputization in Colonial British Columbia

Brenna Bhandar, Nicholas Blomley
Antipode
Canadian Identity and History
article

Laying Waste: Pre‐Emption, Dispossession, and Deputization in Colonial British Columbia

Brenna Bhandar, Nicholas Blomley
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pre‐emption, a legal instrument allowing settlers to acquire Indigenous land via occupation and improvement, is a vital means of colonial dispossession in North America, yet has received relatively little critical attention. Our analysis outlines its significance, shedding new light on the way in which private property power and state authority worked together to shore up colonial jurisdiction, title, and sovereignty in British Columbia. Pre‐emption enrolled “private” actors in sustained forms of ongoing dispossession, removing the Indigenous presence from the land. Pre‐emption created the conditions for violence that was “illegal” on the face of the legislation yet was effectively granted impunity by colonial authorities. That pre‐emption was designed to take place on unsurveyed land and to the exclusion of “Indian settlements” empowered settlers to self‐administer and regulate the appropriation of land, and to define what was open for settlement and what was not, shaping the (il)legal practices of land appropriation.

AntipodeVol. 58(3)
University of British Columbia (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Canadian Identity and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.