Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modelling—Best Scientific Practices to Define Drug Product Performance, Latest Regulatory and Industry Perspectives: Workshop Summary Report

In November 2024, a two-day meeting entitled “PBBM—Best Scientific Practices to Define Drug Product Performance: Latest Regulatory and Industry Perspectives” was organised by the Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences Biopharmaceutics Focus group and hosted by MHRA in London, UK. Physiologically based biopharmaceutics modelling, referred to as PBBM, is used to inform drug product quality strategies and provide a more detailed understanding of how medicines can interact with the human body. Industrial, academic, regulatory, and software company scientists came together to discuss the latest developments in PBBM and to debate key topics relevant to the establishment of best practices and improved implementation. Case study presentations and breakout sessions highlighted how companies are using PBBM in their portfolio decision-making (early development through post-approval changes). Discussions highlighted how the exploration of drug product quality risks has evolved over time, moving from the more empirical BCS classification approach to a more detailed in vivo and mechanistic understanding, where sponsors have and continue to invest in building clinical drug product knowledge. Regulatory scientists shared how they are building experience in using PBBM to set clinically relevant drug product quality specifications, including how they would like to see the area grow in the future. Although significant progress has certainly been made in this field over the last 10 years, the need to continue to bring industry and regulators closer together in the future remains a key topic. Guideline evolution, training and continued dialogue will be essential in reaching a harmonised approach to the use of PBBM to develop drug product strategies and set quality specifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18050566
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modelling—Best Scientific Practices to Define Drug Product Performance, Latest Regulatory and Industry Perspectives: Workshop Summary Report

Xavier Pépin, C. Mackie, Mariana Guimarães, Sumit Arora et al.
Pharmaceutics
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modelling—Best Scientific Practices to Define Drug Product Performance, Latest Regulatory and Industry Perspectives: Workshop Summary Report

Xavier Pépin, C. Mackie, Mariana Guimarães, Sumit Arora, Konstantinos Stamatopoulos, Nico Holmstock, Laurence Dodd, Øyvind Holte, Orla NíÓgáin, Nena Mistry, Christer Tannergren, Chara Litou, Susan Cole, Paul Dickinson, Andrew Butler, Andrea Moir, Aishwarya Ravi, Maria Malamatari, Mark McAllister, Helena Engman, Nikoletta Fotaki, Francesca Gavins, James Butler, Matt Popkin
article en

Abstract

In November 2024, a two-day meeting entitled “PBBM—Best Scientific Practices to Define Drug Product Performance: Latest Regulatory and Industry Perspectives” was organised by the Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences Biopharmaceutics Focus group and hosted by MHRA in London, UK. Physiologically based biopharmaceutics modelling, referred to as PBBM, is used to inform drug product quality strategies and provide a more detailed understanding of how medicines can interact with the human body. Industrial, academic, regulatory, and software company scientists came together to discuss the latest developments in PBBM and to debate key topics relevant to the establishment of best practices and improved implementation. Case study presentations and breakout sessions highlighted how companies are using PBBM in their portfolio decision-making (early development through post-approval changes). Discussions highlighted how the exploration of drug product quality risks has evolved over time, moving from the more empirical BCS classification approach to a more detailed in vivo and mechanistic understanding, where sponsors have and continue to invest in building clinical drug product knowledge. Regulatory scientists shared how they are building experience in using PBBM to set clinically relevant drug product quality specifications, including how they would like to see the area grow in the future. Although significant progress has certainly been made in this field over the last 10 years, the need to continue to bring industry and regulators closer together in the future remains a key topic. Guideline evolution, training and continued dialogue will be essential in reaching a harmonised approach to the use of PBBM to develop drug product strategies and set quality specifications.

PharmaceuticsVol. 18(5)
European Medicines Agency (NL), Thorlabs (Germany) (DE), Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB), Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB), Age UK (GB), Direktoratet for medisinske produkter (NO), Healthcare Technology Innovation Centre (IN), AstraZeneca (Netherlands) (NL), Priory Hospital Cheadle Royal (GB), Sheffield Industrial Museums Trust (GB), AstraZeneca (Poland) (PL), Johnson & Johnson (Brazil) (BR), University of Bath (GB), Simulations Plus (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.