Predicting Gynecologic Postoperative Opioid Use: Expansion and Validation of an Opioid Use Predictive Calculator [ID 3711]

INTRODUCTION: Although most are aware that overprescription contributes to the opioid use epidemic, surgeons continue to overprescribe postoperatively. The objective was to expand an opioid prediction calculator validated in a gynecologic oncology population to a diverse gynecologic population. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent major gynecologic surgery within an academic health system from November 1, 2023, to November 1, 2024, were eligible for inclusion. Patients completed preoperative and postoperative surveys. The original model used seven predictors: age, educational attainment, smoking history, anticipated pain medication use, anxiety regarding surgery, operative time, and pregabalin administration. Model adjustments were evaluated: anticipated instead of actual operating time, pregabalin removal. Outcome variable for model evaluation was number of pills used. Primary outcome was model performance. RESULTS: Data from 616 patients who underwent gynecologic surgery were included: 137 gynecology (22.2%), 154 gynecologic oncology (25.0%), 163 minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (26.4%), 163 urogynecology (26.4%). 226 patients (37%) used zero pills after discharge, and the median number of pills used was 2 (interquartile range, 0, 8). Ordinal concordance index (95% CI) of the original model in the new cohort was 0.70 (0.65–0.74) for predicting 2 or more pills, 0.72 (0.68–0.76) for 5 or more pills, and 0.74 (0.7–0.79) for 10 or more pills. Ordinal concordance index of the adjusted preoperative model was 0.66 (0.64–0.69) for predicting 2 or more pills, 0.66 (0.64–0.69) for 5 or more pills, and 0.66 (0.64–0.69) for 10 or more pills. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The original model performance maintained accuracy and generalized to a population of patients following a greater diversity of gynecologic specialists and subspecialty surgeries. The modified preoperative model also demonstrated sufficient performance. Widespread implementation of this calculator may decrease unused opioids in the community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006265.43
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Gynecologic Postoperative Opioid Use: Expansion and Validation of an Opioid Use Predictive Calculator [ID 3711]

Stephanie L. Lim, Melissa Greene, J. Lafferty, Brittany A. Davidson et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Predicting Gynecologic Postoperative Opioid Use: Expansion and Validation of an Opioid Use Predictive Calculator [ID 3711]

Stephanie L. Lim, Melissa Greene, J. Lafferty, Brittany A. Davidson, Joyce Liu, John E. Jelovsek, Mary K. Anastasio, Laura Havrilesky
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although most are aware that overprescription contributes to the opioid use epidemic, surgeons continue to overprescribe postoperatively. The objective was to expand an opioid prediction calculator validated in a gynecologic oncology population to a diverse gynecologic population. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent major gynecologic surgery within an academic health system from November 1, 2023, to November 1, 2024, were eligible for inclusion. Patients completed preoperative and postoperative surveys. The original model used seven predictors: age, educational attainment, smoking history, anticipated pain medication use, anxiety regarding surgery, operative time, and pregabalin administration. Model adjustments were evaluated: anticipated instead of actual operating time, pregabalin removal. Outcome variable for model evaluation was number of pills used. Primary outcome was model performance. RESULTS: Data from 616 patients who underwent gynecologic surgery were included: 137 gynecology (22.2%), 154 gynecologic oncology (25.0%), 163 minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (26.4%), 163 urogynecology (26.4%). 226 patients (37%) used zero pills after discharge, and the median number of pills used was 2 (interquartile range, 0, 8). Ordinal concordance index (95% CI) of the original model in the new cohort was 0.70 (0.65–0.74) for predicting 2 or more pills, 0.72 (0.68–0.76) for 5 or more pills, and 0.74 (0.7–0.79) for 10 or more pills. Ordinal concordance index of the adjusted preoperative model was 0.66 (0.64–0.69) for predicting 2 or more pills, 0.66 (0.64–0.69) for 5 or more pills, and 0.66 (0.64–0.69) for 10 or more pills. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The original model performance maintained accuracy and generalized to a population of patients following a greater diversity of gynecologic specialists and subspecialty surgeries. The modified preoperative model also demonstrated sufficient performance. Widespread implementation of this calculator may decrease unused opioids in the community.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 147(5S)
Duke University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.