Data-Centric AI Manifesto: How Data Quality Drives Modern AI

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has traditionally been developed according to a model-centric paradigm, in which progress is driven by increasingly sophisticated learning architectures applied to largely fixed datasets. However, this paradigm exhibits well-known limitations, including sensitivity to label noise, distribution shifts, adversarial perturbations, and limited transparency and reproducibility. These issues indicate that many of the current bottlenecks of AI systems arise from deficiencies in data rather than from model design. In this paper, we adopt and formalize the Data-Centric Artificial Intelligence (DCAI) paradigm, which places data quality, semantic consistency, and representativeness at the core of the AI lifecycle. From this perspective, performance, robustness, interpretability, and regulatory compliance are primarily achieved through systematic data engineering, including data curation, enrichment, validation, and continuous monitoring, rather than through repeated model re-engineering. The contributions of this work are threefold. First, a conceptual framework is provided to clarify the epistemic and methodological foundations of DCAI and distinguish it from traditional model-centric approaches. Second, a data-centric lifecycle is presented, covering training data development, inference data design, and data maintenance and integrating techniques such as semantic data representation, active learning, synthetic data generation, and drift-aware quality control. Third, the role of DCAI in the context of Generative AI is analyzed, showing how data-centric practices are essential to ensure robustness, accountability, and responsible deployment of large-scale generative models. Overall, this work positions DCAI as a coherent methodological and technological framework for the development of trustworthy, resilient, and sustainable AI systems, making a research contribution and providing a reference model for industrial and regulatory contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15091913
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-Centric AI Manifesto: How Data Quality Drives Modern AI

Maria Teresa Camerlingo, Donato Malerba, Mario Alviano, Mara Sangiovanni et al.
Electronics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Data-Centric AI Manifesto: How Data Quality Drives Modern AI

Maria Teresa Camerlingo, Donato Malerba, Mario Alviano, Mara Sangiovanni, Domenico Diacono, Vincenzo Pasquadibisceglie, Antonella Poggi, Gioacchino Vino, Roberto Maria Delfino, Domenico Elia, Vincenzo Spinoso, Tommaso Boccali
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has traditionally been developed according to a model-centric paradigm, in which progress is driven by increasingly sophisticated learning architectures applied to largely fixed datasets. However, this paradigm exhibits well-known limitations, including sensitivity to label noise, distribution shifts, adversarial perturbations, and limited transparency and reproducibility. These issues indicate that many of the current bottlenecks of AI systems arise from deficiencies in data rather than from model design. In this paper, we adopt and formalize the Data-Centric Artificial Intelligence (DCAI) paradigm, which places data quality, semantic consistency, and representativeness at the core of the AI lifecycle. From this perspective, performance, robustness, interpretability, and regulatory compliance are primarily achieved through systematic data engineering, including data curation, enrichment, validation, and continuous monitoring, rather than through repeated model re-engineering. The contributions of this work are threefold. First, a conceptual framework is provided to clarify the epistemic and methodological foundations of DCAI and distinguish it from traditional model-centric approaches. Second, a data-centric lifecycle is presented, covering training data development, inference data design, and data maintenance and integrating techniques such as semantic data representation, active learning, synthetic data generation, and drift-aware quality control. Third, the role of DCAI in the context of Generative AI is analyzed, showing how data-centric practices are essential to ensure robustness, accountability, and responsible deployment of large-scale generative models. Overall, this work positions DCAI as a coherent methodological and technological framework for the development of trustworthy, resilient, and sustainable AI systems, making a research contribution and providing a reference model for industrial and regulatory contexts.

ElectronicsVol. 15(9)
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa (IT), University of Calabria (IT), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.