Weighted Average Cost of Capital in Declining Interest Rate Environments (Part II): Qualitative Expert Research

This study constitutes the second part of a comprehensive investigation of the persistence of weighted average cost of capital (WACC) rates despite declining risk-free interest rates. While theory suggests that WACC should reflect lower risk-free interest rates and decline with falling government bond yields, empirical evidence reveals minimal adjustment in the reported WACC figures. Disclosed WACC of DAX40 companies remain between 7% and 8% as the yield of a ten-year German government bond fell from 4.1% to −0.2%. After the quantitative risk analysis (part I) systematically lacks market-based and fundamental explanations—demonstrating that neither systematic risk, overall market risk, earnings risk nor leverage increased sufficiently to justify this stability—this article addresses the resulting explanatory gap through qualitative inquiry. Employing a grounded theory methodology, we investigate the causes and consequences of persistent WACC through systematic analysis of 18 problem-centered semi-structured expert interviews (22 respondents comprising corporate finance executives, investment bankers, strategy consultants, auditors). The investigation reveals that behavioral economics (risk aversion, opportunism, subjectivity), organizational constraints (strategic path dependency, implementation complexity, financial criterion rigidity), and model-theoretic discretion (parameter averaging, analyst influence, supplementary risk adjustments) substantially shape practical WACC determination—factors that quantitative risk analysis cannot capture. Practitioners employ disclosed WACC strategically to reconcile investor return requirements with long-term operational stability, avoid audit friction, and hedge geopolitical–monetary risks—consequences that generate capital opportunity costs offsetting traditional value-maximization objectives. Combined quantitative and qualitative evidence yields actionable insights for value-based capital cost methodologies that are aligned with organizational and market realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19050326
Primary Topic
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighted Average Cost of Capital in Declining Interest Rate Environments (Part II): Qualitative Expert Research

Simon Frey, Harro Heilmann
Journal of risk and financial management
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
article

Weighted Average Cost of Capital in Declining Interest Rate Environments (Part II): Qualitative Expert Research

Simon Frey, Harro Heilmann
article en

Abstract

This study constitutes the second part of a comprehensive investigation of the persistence of weighted average cost of capital (WACC) rates despite declining risk-free interest rates. While theory suggests that WACC should reflect lower risk-free interest rates and decline with falling government bond yields, empirical evidence reveals minimal adjustment in the reported WACC figures. Disclosed WACC of DAX40 companies remain between 7% and 8% as the yield of a ten-year German government bond fell from 4.1% to −0.2%. After the quantitative risk analysis (part I) systematically lacks market-based and fundamental explanations—demonstrating that neither systematic risk, overall market risk, earnings risk nor leverage increased sufficiently to justify this stability—this article addresses the resulting explanatory gap through qualitative inquiry. Employing a grounded theory methodology, we investigate the causes and consequences of persistent WACC through systematic analysis of 18 problem-centered semi-structured expert interviews (22 respondents comprising corporate finance executives, investment bankers, strategy consultants, auditors). The investigation reveals that behavioral economics (risk aversion, opportunism, subjectivity), organizational constraints (strategic path dependency, implementation complexity, financial criterion rigidity), and model-theoretic discretion (parameter averaging, analyst influence, supplementary risk adjustments) substantially shape practical WACC determination—factors that quantitative risk analysis cannot capture. Practitioners employ disclosed WACC strategically to reconcile investor return requirements with long-term operational stability, avoid audit friction, and hedge geopolitical–monetary risks—consequences that generate capital opportunity costs offsetting traditional value-maximization objectives. Combined quantitative and qualitative evidence yields actionable insights for value-based capital cost methodologies that are aligned with organizational and market realities.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 19(5)
Hochschule Aalen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.