Predictors of Clinical Trial Participation Among Older U.S. Adults With Multimorbidity: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

Older adults, women, and minorities are under-represented in clinical trials. Our objective was to identify characteristics predicting participation in clinical trials of medications in a diverse sample of older adults; and, secondarily, identify current participation motivators and barriers and trial preferences. A cross-sectional U.S. community convenience sample survey of adults > 65 years with > 3 chronic medical conditions querying attitudes about participation in clinical trials was conducted from March 2023-October 2024 in English and Spanish. Formats were yes/no or three-point Likert scale answers. Multivariable logistic regression identified characteristics with higher likelihood of trial participation. Surveys were from 2176 older adults (White (50.3%), Black/African American (18.5%), Hispanic/Latino (17.7%), Asian (13.5%) aged 73.1 ± 6.1 years (mean, SD), 52% women,one 4.1 ± 1.9 medical conditions; taking 7.4 ± 3.2 medications. Characteristics with higher likelihood of trial participation were higher income (1.36, 0.93-1.99; Odds Ratio, 95% Confidence Interval), educational status (1.88, 1.12-3.0), greater health literacy (2.07, 1.29-3.3), having cancer (1.49, 1.11-1.99) or chronic pain (1.55, 1.17-2.06), Black/African American race (1.44, 1.02-2.02) or Hispanic/Latino race/ethnicity (1.55, 1.11-2.16). Females had lower likelihood of participation (0.66, 1.29-3.32) as did age 75 and above (0.67, 0.50-0.92). Disincentives in women were potential side effects, placeboes, visit travel > 1 h, and video visits. Prior participants and nonparticipants were more likely to consider participation after physician recommendation (92% and 76.4%, respectively). Better care would motivate the highest percentage of all respondents. Education about trials including possible benefits, addressing concerns of women, physician involvement during recruitment and trials with in-person visits may increase representative enrollment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70573
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of Clinical Trial Participation Among Older U.S. Adults With Multimorbidity: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

Janice B. Schwartz, W. John Boscardin, Ruey‐Ying Liu, Derjung M. Tarn
Clinical and Translational Science
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Predictors of Clinical Trial Participation Among Older U.S. Adults With Multimorbidity: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

Janice B. Schwartz, W. John Boscardin, Ruey‐Ying Liu, Derjung M. Tarn
article en

Abstract

Older adults, women, and minorities are under-represented in clinical trials. Our objective was to identify characteristics predicting participation in clinical trials of medications in a diverse sample of older adults; and, secondarily, identify current participation motivators and barriers and trial preferences. A cross-sectional U.S. community convenience sample survey of adults > 65 years with > 3 chronic medical conditions querying attitudes about participation in clinical trials was conducted from March 2023-October 2024 in English and Spanish. Formats were yes/no or three-point Likert scale answers. Multivariable logistic regression identified characteristics with higher likelihood of trial participation. Surveys were from 2176 older adults (White (50.3%), Black/African American (18.5%), Hispanic/Latino (17.7%), Asian (13.5%) aged 73.1 ± 6.1 years (mean, SD), 52% women,one 4.1 ± 1.9 medical conditions; taking 7.4 ± 3.2 medications. Characteristics with higher likelihood of trial participation were higher income (1.36, 0.93-1.99; Odds Ratio, 95% Confidence Interval), educational status (1.88, 1.12-3.0), greater health literacy (2.07, 1.29-3.3), having cancer (1.49, 1.11-1.99) or chronic pain (1.55, 1.17-2.06), Black/African American race (1.44, 1.02-2.02) or Hispanic/Latino race/ethnicity (1.55, 1.11-2.16). Females had lower likelihood of participation (0.66, 1.29-3.32) as did age 75 and above (0.67, 0.50-0.92). Disincentives in women were potential side effects, placeboes, visit travel > 1 h, and video visits. Prior participants and nonparticipants were more likely to consider participation after physician recommendation (92% and 76.4%, respectively). Better care would motivate the highest percentage of all respondents. Education about trials including possible benefits, addressing concerns of women, physician involvement during recruitment and trials with in-person visits may increase representative enrollment.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 19(5)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), National Chengchi University (TW)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.