Restorative Journeys: Youth Offending Trajectories and Victim Recovery Following Restorative Justice Conferencing

ABSTRACT Restorative justice (RJ) is associated with offenders’ movement away from crime and victim recovery. However, little is known about the circumstances under which RJ can simultaneously achieve the dual objectives. Using secondary data from the South Australian Juvenile Justice study, this research examines how RJ conferencing shapes short‐term youth offending trajectories and victim recovery through relational analysis. Drawing on 60 case observations as well as 60 paired interviews and 60 paired follow‐up interviews, totalling 240 interviews, the study demonstrates that outcomes are shaped less by offence characteristics than by relational alignment, emotional readiness, and meaning‐making during RJ conferencing. While some encounters support both short‐term non‐offending and victim recovery, others produce asymmetrical benefits or fail to generate meaningful change. The study highlights the value of paired relational analysis and cautions against treating RJ as a uniform or universally effective intervention in youth justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.70038
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restorative Journeys: Youth Offending Trajectories and Victim Recovery Following Restorative Justice Conferencing

Masahiro Suzuki
The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Restorative Journeys: Youth Offending Trajectories and Victim Recovery Following Restorative Justice Conferencing

Masahiro Suzuki
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Restorative justice (RJ) is associated with offenders’ movement away from crime and victim recovery. However, little is known about the circumstances under which RJ can simultaneously achieve the dual objectives. Using secondary data from the South Australian Juvenile Justice study, this research examines how RJ conferencing shapes short‐term youth offending trajectories and victim recovery through relational analysis. Drawing on 60 case observations as well as 60 paired interviews and 60 paired follow‐up interviews, totalling 240 interviews, the study demonstrates that outcomes are shaped less by offence characteristics than by relational alignment, emotional readiness, and meaning‐making during RJ conferencing. While some encounters support both short‐term non‐offending and victim recovery, others produce asymmetrical benefits or fail to generate meaningful change. The study highlights the value of paired relational analysis and cautions against treating RJ as a uniform or universally effective intervention in youth justice.

The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice
Loughborough University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.