The Role of CD56 as an Immunophenotypic Marker in the Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma

Background: CD56 expression has been proposed as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in multiple myeloma. However, its clinical relevance in the context of modern induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains controversial. Methods: The researchers studied individuals with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. CD56 expression was assessed by flow cytometry at diagnosis. Assessment was performed to determine patients’ responses to induction therapy and to measure their progression-free and overall survival rates. Results: The study included 88 participants, of whom 68 (77%) were CD56-positive, and 20 (23%) were CD56-negative. The study results showed that CD56(−) patients developed plasmacytomas at a 70% rate, while CD56(+) patients had a 46% rate (p = 0.055). A similar pattern was observed for extramedullary lesions (p = 0.006). The induction response rate was lower in CD56-negative patients than in CD56-positive patients (65% vs. 85%, p = 0.043). Patients who did not experience relapse received more CD34+ cells (11.9 ± 5.71 vs. 9.29 ± 2.57 × 106/kg, p = 0.012) and had higher post-transplant response rates (91% vs. 63%, p = 0.002). The patients who received induction treatment before their disease showed better survival outcomes than patients who did not respond to treatment (90.2% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.029) and patients who did not experience relapse (92.7% vs. 85.0%, p = 0.022). CD56 status did not affect survival outcomes. Conclusions: CD56 expression is associated with disease burden and response to induction therapy in multiple myeloma, supporting its role as an early disease-modifying factor. However, its prognostic value appears limited in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT, suggesting that intensive treatment may mitigate the adverse impact of CD56 negativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093492
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of CD56 as an Immunophenotypic Marker in the Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma

Gulnur Zhakhina, Aigerim Sipenova, Inna Berger, Ulbolsyn Orumbayeva et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

The Role of CD56 as an Immunophenotypic Marker in the Clinical Course of Multiple Myeloma

Gulnur Zhakhina, Aigerim Sipenova, Inna Berger, Ulbolsyn Orumbayeva, Gulnur Mamyr, Akbota Tursyn, Fariza Shokubaeva, Olga Kolesnikova, Nazym Temir, Zhuldyz Iskakova, Ayagul Ainabay, Alexandr Kolesnev, Zhandos Burkitbayev, Meiramgul Yussupova, Aidana Shalkarbekova, Rose Ibragimova, Vadim Kemaikin, Azat Karabekov
article en

Abstract

Background: CD56 expression has been proposed as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in multiple myeloma. However, its clinical relevance in the context of modern induction therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains controversial. Methods: The researchers studied individuals with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. CD56 expression was assessed by flow cytometry at diagnosis. Assessment was performed to determine patients’ responses to induction therapy and to measure their progression-free and overall survival rates. Results: The study included 88 participants, of whom 68 (77%) were CD56-positive, and 20 (23%) were CD56-negative. The study results showed that CD56(−) patients developed plasmacytomas at a 70% rate, while CD56(+) patients had a 46% rate (p = 0.055). A similar pattern was observed for extramedullary lesions (p = 0.006). The induction response rate was lower in CD56-negative patients than in CD56-positive patients (65% vs. 85%, p = 0.043). Patients who did not experience relapse received more CD34+ cells (11.9 ± 5.71 vs. 9.29 ± 2.57 × 106/kg, p = 0.012) and had higher post-transplant response rates (91% vs. 63%, p = 0.002). The patients who received induction treatment before their disease showed better survival outcomes than patients who did not respond to treatment (90.2% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.029) and patients who did not experience relapse (92.7% vs. 85.0%, p = 0.022). CD56 status did not affect survival outcomes. Conclusions: CD56 expression is associated with disease burden and response to induction therapy in multiple myeloma, supporting its role as an early disease-modifying factor. However, its prognostic value appears limited in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT, suggesting that intensive treatment may mitigate the adverse impact of CD56 negativity.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(9)
National Center for Biotechnology (KZ), Astana Medical University (KZ), National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health (KZ), Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute (UZ), Nazarbayev University (KZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.