Women's Representation on Boards and Board Processes: Curvilinear Relationships, Moderated by Board Chair Authentic Leadership

ABSTRACT Research Question/Issue We examine how women's representation on boards (WRB) shapes board processes (effort norms, cognitive conflict, and use of knowledge and skills) and how board chairs' leadership moderates those relationships. Our theory integrates insights from information processing theory with intergroup threat theory. Research Findings/Insights Our survey of 731 directors across 95 boards shows that WRB helps board processes up to a point, after which the effect reverses. The inverted U‐shaped relationships peak below gender parity, meaning benefits diminish before WRB reaches 50%. Boards led by more authentic chairs demonstrate better board processes and less variance in processes at different levels of WRB, likely because their directors perceive less threat and more psychological safety. Theoretical/Academic Implications This study (1) expands our understanding of how WRB shapes board processes, complementing prior research focused on firm‐level outcomes and women's critical mass; (2) highlights unintended negative dynamics in upper‐echelon teams as WRB tends toward parity; (3) identifies board chairs' authentic leadership as an explanation for variance in boards' ability to convert WRB into higher effort norms and better use of directors' knowledge and skills, contributing to research on leadership in diverse boards; (4) contributes to information processing theory by suggesting that high conflict‐avoidance may represent an important boundary for the effectiveness of diversity in upper echelons; and (5) contributes to status threat theory by showing that the precise majority–minority tipping point may depend on what is at stake. Practitioner/Policy Implication Directors should remain vigilant to subtle biases and resistance as board diversity increases. Board chairs can enhance authentic leadership by embracing self‐awareness, transparency, and consistency. Policymakers promoting gender equity on boards must anticipate and address challenges linked to increasing diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Governance An International Review
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.70040
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women's Representation on Boards and Board Processes: Curvilinear Relationships, Moderated by Board Chair Authentic Leadership

Caroline Aubé, Samuel Sponem, Claude Francoeur, Corinne Post
Corporate Governance An International Review
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Women's Representation on Boards and Board Processes: Curvilinear Relationships, Moderated by Board Chair Authentic Leadership

Caroline Aubé, Samuel Sponem, Claude Francoeur, Corinne Post
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research Question/Issue We examine how women's representation on boards (WRB) shapes board processes (effort norms, cognitive conflict, and use of knowledge and skills) and how board chairs' leadership moderates those relationships. Our theory integrates insights from information processing theory with intergroup threat theory. Research Findings/Insights Our survey of 731 directors across 95 boards shows that WRB helps board processes up to a point, after which the effect reverses. The inverted U‐shaped relationships peak below gender parity, meaning benefits diminish before WRB reaches 50%. Boards led by more authentic chairs demonstrate better board processes and less variance in processes at different levels of WRB, likely because their directors perceive less threat and more psychological safety. Theoretical/Academic Implications This study (1) expands our understanding of how WRB shapes board processes, complementing prior research focused on firm‐level outcomes and women's critical mass; (2) highlights unintended negative dynamics in upper‐echelon teams as WRB tends toward parity; (3) identifies board chairs' authentic leadership as an explanation for variance in boards' ability to convert WRB into higher effort norms and better use of directors' knowledge and skills, contributing to research on leadership in diverse boards; (4) contributes to information processing theory by suggesting that high conflict‐avoidance may represent an important boundary for the effectiveness of diversity in upper echelons; and (5) contributes to status threat theory by showing that the precise majority–minority tipping point may depend on what is at stake. Practitioner/Policy Implication Directors should remain vigilant to subtle biases and resistance as board diversity increases. Board chairs can enhance authentic leadership by embracing self‐awareness, transparency, and consistency. Policymakers promoting gender equity on boards must anticipate and address challenges linked to increasing diversity.

Corporate Governance An International Review
HEC Montréal (CA), Villanova University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.