Gini Variance Estimation of Grouped Data

ABSTRACT We propose a jackknife variance estimator for the Gini Index based on grouped data. It only requires access to group means and counts, and is computationally fast, modifying an existing algorithm that exploits the Gini's connection with regression modelling. After reviewing the group‐level point estimator, we discuss its asymptotic normality and our jackknife's consistency. We then conduct a multiplicative random effects simulation, comparing the jackknife's results to those of an off‐the‐shelf method for variance estimation in this setting. The jackknife is more stable across within‐group variations and more closely approximates the true group‐level variance, although cases of extreme inequality may require very high sample sizes to achieve desired accuracy. We conclude with thoughts for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70079
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gini Variance Estimation of Grouped Data

Sean Dalby, Huixia Judy Wang
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
article

Gini Variance Estimation of Grouped Data

Sean Dalby, Huixia Judy Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We propose a jackknife variance estimator for the Gini Index based on grouped data. It only requires access to group means and counts, and is computationally fast, modifying an existing algorithm that exploits the Gini's connection with regression modelling. After reviewing the group‐level point estimator, we discuss its asymptotic normality and our jackknife's consistency. We then conduct a multiplicative random effects simulation, comparing the jackknife's results to those of an off‐the‐shelf method for variance estimation in this setting. The jackknife is more stable across within‐group variations and more closely approximates the true group‐level variance, although cases of extreme inequality may require very high sample sizes to achieve desired accuracy. We conclude with thoughts for future research.

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
George Washington University (US), Rice University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.