Stimuli-responsive 4D-bioprinted constructs for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration: Shape-morphing mechanisms, cell-laden bioink engineering, and preclinical outcomes
Introduction: Musculoskeletal disorders impose a substantial global disability burden. Conventional 3D bioprinting cannot replicate the dynamic, anisotropic architecture of bone, cartilage, skeletal muscle, and cardiac muscle. Four-dimensional (4D) bioprinting addresses this by integrating stimuli-responsive materials into constructs, enabling programmed shape transformation and adaptive behavior following implantation. Methods: This narrative review examines primary experimental research on stimuli-responsive 4D-bioprinted musculoskeletal constructs, drawing on in vitro, in vivo, and combined outcomes from leading peer-reviewed journals. Results: Evidence spans four stimuli modalities - magnetic actuation, near-infrared (NIR) photothermal response, thermoresponsive swelling-shrinking transitions, and shape memory polymer (SMP) recovery - applied across bone, cartilage, skeletal muscle, and cardiac constructs. Bioink formulations from silk fibroin-gelatin composites and alginate-polydopamine inks to GelMA-based hydrogels and polyester SMPs present trade-offs between printability, shape fidelity, and cellular compatibility. Cross-study synthesis identifies stiffness trajectory, architectural anisotropy, and dynamic deformation as primary mechano-biological axes directing cell fate decisions. Preclinical studies document encouraging ossification and chondrogenesis outcomes, though constructs fall short of native tissue mechanical benchmarks. Conclusion: Translational barriers range from fundamental physical constraints - including the mechanical performance gap and stimulus penetration depth limitations - to incremental engineering challenges amenable to near-term resolution. Passive hydration-driven deployment represents the most clinically tractable strategy, while multifunctional bioinks integrating stimuli-responsiveness, bioactive factor presentation, and cell-instructive surface chemistry define the primary material development direction.
Authors
- Suleiman Ibrahim Mohammad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-9063)
- Pardeep Singh Bains (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5500-2421)
- Ahmed Fekry Salman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8164-0883)
- Manveet Singh
- Mohammad Ebrahim Astaneh
- Narges Fereydouni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-1669)
- Asokan Vasudevan
- Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan
- Ripendeep Singh
- Parvoz Abdulkhakimov
Institutions
- Chandigarh University (IN)
- Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO)
- INTI International University (MY)
- Marwadi University (IN)
- Samarkand State Medical Institute (UZ)
- Fasa University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Sohar University (OM)
- Chitkara University (IN)
- Sharda University (IN)
- University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar (PK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Regenerative Therapy
- Published
- 2026-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2026.101119
- Primary Topic
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Fasa University of Medical Sciences