Evaluation of Parasite Concentrator Kit and Kato–Katz Method for Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Stool Samples

Background: To address the significant burden of helminthiases in Thailand, this cross-sectional study compared the performance of a fecal parasite concentrator kit (FPCK) against the Kato–Katz (KK) method for diagnosing intestinal parasites in endemic populations across the Northeast and Southern regions. Methods: Stool samples were collected from 140 participants and examined for intestinal parasitic infections using both FPCK and KK methods. Results: The FPCK method demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate of 45.0% compared to 35.0% for the KK method. For detecting liver fluke (Opisthorchis viverrini), the FPCK method detected significantly more cases than the KK method (10.71% vs. 4.29%) (p = 0.0027). For other parasites such as Trichuris trichiura, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Entamoeba coli, the FPCK method tended to detect more infections, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The FPCK method showed better performance than the KK method for detecting intestinal helminth infections in stool samples, particularly O. viverrini, T. trichiura, S. stercoralis, and Entamoeba coli. Therefore, FPCK could be used as a suitable stool examination method for surveillance and monitoring of preventive treatment for opisthorchiasis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed11050118
Primary Topic
Parasites and Host Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Parasite Concentrator Kit and Kato–Katz Method for Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Stool Samples

Patcharaporn Boonroumkaew, Tongjit Thanchomnang, Penchom Janwan, Pewpan M. Intapan et al.
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Parasites and Host Interactions
article

Evaluation of Parasite Concentrator Kit and Kato–Katz Method for Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Stool Samples

Patcharaporn Boonroumkaew, Tongjit Thanchomnang, Penchom Janwan, Pewpan M. Intapan, Rutchanee Rodpai, Pokkamol Laoraksawong, Wanchai Maleewong, Oranuch Sanpool, Lakkhana Sadaow
article en

Abstract

Background: To address the significant burden of helminthiases in Thailand, this cross-sectional study compared the performance of a fecal parasite concentrator kit (FPCK) against the Kato–Katz (KK) method for diagnosing intestinal parasites in endemic populations across the Northeast and Southern regions. Methods: Stool samples were collected from 140 participants and examined for intestinal parasitic infections using both FPCK and KK methods. Results: The FPCK method demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate of 45.0% compared to 35.0% for the KK method. For detecting liver fluke (Opisthorchis viverrini), the FPCK method detected significantly more cases than the KK method (10.71% vs. 4.29%) (p = 0.0027). For other parasites such as Trichuris trichiura, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Entamoeba coli, the FPCK method tended to detect more infections, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The FPCK method showed better performance than the KK method for detecting intestinal helminth infections in stool samples, particularly O. viverrini, T. trichiura, S. stercoralis, and Entamoeba coli. Therefore, FPCK could be used as a suitable stool examination method for surveillance and monitoring of preventive treatment for opisthorchiasis.

Tropical Medicine and Infectious DiseaseVol. 11(5)
Mahasarakham University (TH), Khon Kaen University (TH), Walailak University (TH)
Khon Kaen University, National Research Council of Thailand
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Parasites and Host Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.