Validation of ERA5 and ERA5-Land ECMWF Reanalysis on the Mountainous Coast of Northeastern Brazil

Reanalysis datasets provide gridded, high-frequency estimates of atmospheric variables that are essential for studying weather and climate, particularly in regions with sparse observational networks. Despite their widespread use, the quality of reanalysis products remains insufficiently validated in tropical regions, particularly in areas with complex terrain. In this study, we evaluate the performance of surface-level temperature and atmospheric pressure fields from ERA5 and ERA5-Land in the state of Alagoas, northeastern Brazil. The analysis is based on a 12-year comparison (2008–2019) with observational data from the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET). Prior to validation, altitude corrections were applied to minimize elevation-induced biases in the reanalysis fields. Performance was assessed using statistical metrics. Both reanalyses showed strong agreement with observations, with average correlations exceeding 0.91 for temperature and pressure. ERA5 temperature biases ranged from −0.2 °C to 0.3 °C, and those for ERA5-Land from −0.6 °C to −0.3 °C, with RMSE around 1.6 °C. Pressure biases were initially larger (−20 hPa to +6 hPa in ERA5), but were reduced to below 0.5 hPa at key reference stations after correction. Diurnal and seasonal cycle analyses confirmed the datasets’ ability to reproduce temporal variability, though both reanalyses tended to overestimate minimum temperatures and underestimate maximum temperatures. Further investigation is needed to identify the origin of anomalous temperature jumps in ERA5’s diurnal cycle, which seem unrelated to the assimilation cycles. Overall, the results highlight the robust performance of ERA5 and ERA5-Land in representing surface atmospheric conditions in tropical coastal regions, while also emphasizing the continued need for regional validation and preprocessing before application in high-resolution or short-term studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cli14050098
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of ERA5 and ERA5-Land ECMWF Reanalysis on the Mountainous Coast of Northeastern Brazil

Monalisa Silva, Fabrício D S Silva, Helber B. Gomes, Henrique M. J. Barbosa et al.
Climate
Climate variability and models
article

Validation of ERA5 and ERA5-Land ECMWF Reanalysis on the Mountainous Coast of Northeastern Brazil

Monalisa Silva, Fabrício D S Silva, Helber B. Gomes, Henrique M. J. Barbosa, Ismael G. F. de Freitas, Dirceu L. Herdies, Kécia M. R. Silva, Robson B. dos Passos
article en

Abstract

Reanalysis datasets provide gridded, high-frequency estimates of atmospheric variables that are essential for studying weather and climate, particularly in regions with sparse observational networks. Despite their widespread use, the quality of reanalysis products remains insufficiently validated in tropical regions, particularly in areas with complex terrain. In this study, we evaluate the performance of surface-level temperature and atmospheric pressure fields from ERA5 and ERA5-Land in the state of Alagoas, northeastern Brazil. The analysis is based on a 12-year comparison (2008–2019) with observational data from the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET). Prior to validation, altitude corrections were applied to minimize elevation-induced biases in the reanalysis fields. Performance was assessed using statistical metrics. Both reanalyses showed strong agreement with observations, with average correlations exceeding 0.91 for temperature and pressure. ERA5 temperature biases ranged from −0.2 °C to 0.3 °C, and those for ERA5-Land from −0.6 °C to −0.3 °C, with RMSE around 1.6 °C. Pressure biases were initially larger (−20 hPa to +6 hPa in ERA5), but were reduced to below 0.5 hPa at key reference stations after correction. Diurnal and seasonal cycle analyses confirmed the datasets’ ability to reproduce temporal variability, though both reanalyses tended to overestimate minimum temperatures and underestimate maximum temperatures. Further investigation is needed to identify the origin of anomalous temperature jumps in ERA5’s diurnal cycle, which seem unrelated to the assimilation cycles. Overall, the results highlight the robust performance of ERA5 and ERA5-Land in representing surface atmospheric conditions in tropical coastal regions, while also emphasizing the continued need for regional validation and preprocessing before application in high-resolution or short-term studies.

ClimateVol. 14(5)
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (BR), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), Universidade Federal de Alagoas (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR), Universidade Federal de Itajubá (BR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.