Multiscale damage mechanisms of limestone under acid, alkali, and cyclic conditions

Abstract Chemical corrosion is a critical factor driving the degradation of rock engineering properties, particularly in carbonate-rich formations. To investigate the mechanisms of limestone deterioration under extreme chemical conditions, this study conducted continuous immersion tests in acidic (pH = 2, H₂SO₄) and alkaline (pH = 12, NaOH) solutions, together with wet–dry cycling and acid–alkali alternation experiments. A control group without chemical treatment was also included for comparison. The macroscopic and microscopic responses of limestone were systematically analyzed through porosity, mass loss, P-wave velocity, uniaxial compressive strength, and microstructural characterization. Results revealed that degradation severity followed the order: acid–alkali alternation > acidic wet–dry cycling > continuous acid immersion > alkaline ≈ control. After 30 days, the acid–alkali alternation group exhibited the most severe deterioration, with porosity increasing from 0.29% to 0.42%, mass loss reaching 0.92%, P-wave velocity decreasing from 5796 m/s (10 days) to 5268 m/s (30 days), and UCS declining from 43.83 MPa (10 days) to 33.73 MPa (30 days). At the microscale, acidic conditions promoted CaCO 3 dissolution with CaSO₄ precipitation (up to 11.6% during wet–dry cycles), enlarging pores and pore throats, while acid–alkali alternation triggered cyclic precipitation–dissolution stresses that produced interconnected microcrack networks. In contrast, alkaline conditions showed only weak passivation and precipitation. A strength prediction model was established based on the chemical damage variable D defined by P-wave velocity, which exhibited a strong power-law relationship with strength (R 2 ≈ 0.93). This study explains three coupled mechanisms—dissolution-dominated, dissolution–crystallization synergy, and chemical fatigue—and proposes a simple, economical, and non-destructive velocity–strength framework for rapid durability assessment and early warning in acid rain, industrial effluent, and underground engineering contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-026-04989-x
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiscale damage mechanisms of limestone under acid, alkali, and cyclic conditions

Meldi Suhatril, Puteri Azura Sari, Huzaifa Hashim, Han Zihao et al.
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Multiscale damage mechanisms of limestone under acid, alkali, and cyclic conditions

Meldi Suhatril, Puteri Azura Sari, Huzaifa Hashim, Han Zihao, Zhu Xi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Chemical corrosion is a critical factor driving the degradation of rock engineering properties, particularly in carbonate-rich formations. To investigate the mechanisms of limestone deterioration under extreme chemical conditions, this study conducted continuous immersion tests in acidic (pH = 2, H₂SO₄) and alkaline (pH = 12, NaOH) solutions, together with wet–dry cycling and acid–alkali alternation experiments. A control group without chemical treatment was also included for comparison. The macroscopic and microscopic responses of limestone were systematically analyzed through porosity, mass loss, P-wave velocity, uniaxial compressive strength, and microstructural characterization. Results revealed that degradation severity followed the order: acid–alkali alternation > acidic wet–dry cycling > continuous acid immersion > alkaline ≈ control. After 30 days, the acid–alkali alternation group exhibited the most severe deterioration, with porosity increasing from 0.29% to 0.42%, mass loss reaching 0.92%, P-wave velocity decreasing from 5796 m/s (10 days) to 5268 m/s (30 days), and UCS declining from 43.83 MPa (10 days) to 33.73 MPa (30 days). At the microscale, acidic conditions promoted CaCO 3 dissolution with CaSO₄ precipitation (up to 11.6% during wet–dry cycles), enlarging pores and pore throats, while acid–alkali alternation triggered cyclic precipitation–dissolution stresses that produced interconnected microcrack networks. In contrast, alkaline conditions showed only weak passivation and precipitation. A strength prediction model was established based on the chemical damage variable D defined by P-wave velocity, which exhibited a strong power-law relationship with strength (R 2 ≈ 0.93). This study explains three coupled mechanisms—dissolution-dominated, dissolution–crystallization synergy, and chemical fatigue—and proposes a simple, economical, and non-destructive velocity–strength framework for rapid durability assessment and early warning in acid rain, industrial effluent, and underground engineering contexts.

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the EnvironmentVol. 85(5)
Universiti Malaya
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.