Oral Health Perceptions and Self-reported Oral Problems among E-cigarette, Conventional, and Dual Smokers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abstract Background: Although the use of e-cigarettes has increased worldwide, their effects on oral health compared to conventional and dual tobacco use remain insufficient. Understanding behavioral, sociodemographic, and environmental factors that predict smoking type is crucial for targeted prevention programs. Aim: To assess and compare oral health perceptions, sociodemographic differences, and self-reported oral problems among e-cigarette, conventional, and dual smokers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults aged 17 and older ( n = 705) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using a validated questionnaire. Participants were classified into e-cigarette smokers ( n = 462), conventional smokers ( n = 49), and dual users ( n = 194). The questionnaire assessed sociodemographic characteristics, oral health perceptions, knowledge, and perceived oral health problems. Chi-square tests co0mpared categorical variables, whereas logistic regression models evaluated predictors of smoking type, including age, sex, income, education, and dental-visit frequency. Results: Dual smokers had the highest prevalence of dental caries (65.5%), teeth discoloration (77.8%), changes in gingival color (77.3%), and calculus/plaque accumulation (64.4%). E-cigarette smokers were significantly more likely to believe that e-cigarettes reduced passive smoking (68.18%, P < 0.001) and were less harmful than conventional cigarettes (80.74%, P < 0.001). Chi-square testing showed a significant difference in sex distribution ( P = 0.016), with e-cigarette users being proportionally more female (61.5%) than males (38.5%). Regression analysis showed that individuals with a monthly income of 3,000–10,000 SR had lower odds of being conventional smokers compared with e-cigarette smokers (odds ratio [OR] =0.30, confidence interval CI = 0.10–0.90, P = 0.033). Conclusions: Dual smokers reported the poorest oral health outcomes due to compounded risks. E-cigarette users misperceive the safety of e-cigarettes. These findings emphasize the need for targeted dental public health interventions to provide evidence-based education and tailored cessation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Letters in Medical Sciences
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/lms.lms_31_25
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral Health Perceptions and Self-reported Oral Problems among E-cigarette, Conventional, and Dual Smokers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Shaimaa Murdhi Alenezi, Haya Nasser Bin Tuwaim, Rasha Nesha Alotaibi, Sarah Abdulaziz Alsalamah
Letters in Medical Sciences
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Oral Health Perceptions and Self-reported Oral Problems among E-cigarette, Conventional, and Dual Smokers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Shaimaa Murdhi Alenezi, Haya Nasser Bin Tuwaim, Rasha Nesha Alotaibi, Sarah Abdulaziz Alsalamah
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Although the use of e-cigarettes has increased worldwide, their effects on oral health compared to conventional and dual tobacco use remain insufficient. Understanding behavioral, sociodemographic, and environmental factors that predict smoking type is crucial for targeted prevention programs. Aim: To assess and compare oral health perceptions, sociodemographic differences, and self-reported oral problems among e-cigarette, conventional, and dual smokers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults aged 17 and older ( n = 705) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using a validated questionnaire. Participants were classified into e-cigarette smokers ( n = 462), conventional smokers ( n = 49), and dual users ( n = 194). The questionnaire assessed sociodemographic characteristics, oral health perceptions, knowledge, and perceived oral health problems. Chi-square tests co0mpared categorical variables, whereas logistic regression models evaluated predictors of smoking type, including age, sex, income, education, and dental-visit frequency. Results: Dual smokers had the highest prevalence of dental caries (65.5%), teeth discoloration (77.8%), changes in gingival color (77.3%), and calculus/plaque accumulation (64.4%). E-cigarette smokers were significantly more likely to believe that e-cigarettes reduced passive smoking (68.18%, P < 0.001) and were less harmful than conventional cigarettes (80.74%, P < 0.001). Chi-square testing showed a significant difference in sex distribution ( P = 0.016), with e-cigarette users being proportionally more female (61.5%) than males (38.5%). Regression analysis showed that individuals with a monthly income of 3,000–10,000 SR had lower odds of being conventional smokers compared with e-cigarette smokers (odds ratio [OR] =0.30, confidence interval CI = 0.10–0.90, P = 0.033). Conclusions: Dual smokers reported the poorest oral health outcomes due to compounded risks. E-cigarette users misperceive the safety of e-cigarettes. These findings emphasize the need for targeted dental public health interventions to provide evidence-based education and tailored cessation strategies.

Letters in Medical Sciences
King Saud University (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.