Robust-Mean–Geometric-Mean and Robust Haberman Linking with Invariant Item Discriminations Under Sparse Differential Item Functioning

Comparison of two or multiple groups based on dichotomous items is a central task in item response theory (IRT) linking. This article considers the two-parameter logistic scaling model under sparse differential item functioning (DIF) in item intercepts and DIF-free item discriminations. Robust-mean-geometric-mean (RMGM) and robust Haberman (RHAB) linking are compared across several loss functions and under scaling models with noninvariant or invariant item discriminations. Two simulation studies show that invariant item discriminations improve the precision of estimated group means. In addition, the L0 loss function is generally preferable to the L1 and L0.5 loss functions when DIF proportions or sample sizes are large. Several empirical examples illustrate the proposed specifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14091549
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust-Mean–Geometric-Mean and Robust Haberman Linking with Invariant Item Discriminations Under Sparse Differential Item Functioning

Alexander Robitzsch
Mathematics
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Robust-Mean–Geometric-Mean and Robust Haberman Linking with Invariant Item Discriminations Under Sparse Differential Item Functioning

Alexander Robitzsch
article en

Abstract

Comparison of two or multiple groups based on dichotomous items is a central task in item response theory (IRT) linking. This article considers the two-parameter logistic scaling model under sparse differential item functioning (DIF) in item intercepts and DIF-free item discriminations. Robust-mean-geometric-mean (RMGM) and robust Haberman (RHAB) linking are compared across several loss functions and under scaling models with noninvariant or invariant item discriminations. Two simulation studies show that invariant item discriminations improve the precision of estimated group means. In addition, the L0 loss function is generally preferable to the L1 and L0.5 loss functions when DIF proportions or sample sizes are large. Several empirical examples illustrate the proposed specifications.

MathematicsVol. 14(9)
PE International (Germany) (DE), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.