Development of Requirements for Ensuring the Security of Artificial Intelligence Technologies

This research article proposes comprehensive requirements for securing artificial intelligence systems, focusing on large language models (LLMs) in organizational settings. It addresses risks like unauthorized access, data leakage, service instability, and introduces "veracity" alongside the classic CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, availability). The paper advocates a two-contour access model: an Open Contour (OC) for public LLMs and an Internal Contour (IC) for corporate/individual models, separated by a gateway for filtered interactions. A mandatory Request Control Module (RCM) monitors all user-LLM exchanges, enforcing limits on request frequency, size, and content to block sensitive data transfers. Secure training mandates dataset cleaning, depersonalization, and documentation, approved by security leads. Key Security Requirements: Corporate LLMs in IC with firewalls and access controls; public ones restricted to OC. Network/Access: Encrypted channels, user authentication, and logging for audits. Availability: Overload protection via RCM limits and reservations. Threat Analysis - drawing from OWASP Top 10 for LLMs (v1.1), it covers prompt injection (LLM01), data poisoning (LLM03), insecure output (LLM02 leading to XSS/SSRF), excess requests (LLM04/06), model theft (LLM10), and info disclosure. The dual-contour setup mitigates many via filtering and separation but notes limits against sophisticated attacks or human errors. Recommends DevSecOps pipelines integrating security across plan, develop, build, test, deploy, and monitor stages (e.g., SAST/DAST, SCA). Tables detail threat coverage, architecture strengths (e.g., centralized monitoring), and weaknesses (e.g., public model opacity). In conclusion, these practical guidelines enhance LLM resilience in enterprises, aligning with NIST AI RMF and ENISA practices, while calling for further automated vulnerability tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Discovery Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdai.20260102.13
Primary Topic
Big Data and Digital Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Requirements for Ensuring the Security of Artificial Intelligence Technologies

Anna Shcherbakova, Andrey Shcherbakov, Elena Malkova
Science Discovery Artificial Intelligence
Big Data and Digital Economy
article

Development of Requirements for Ensuring the Security of Artificial Intelligence Technologies

Anna Shcherbakova, Andrey Shcherbakov, Elena Malkova
article en

Abstract

This research article proposes comprehensive requirements for securing artificial intelligence systems, focusing on large language models (LLMs) in organizational settings. It addresses risks like unauthorized access, data leakage, service instability, and introduces "veracity" alongside the classic CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, availability). The paper advocates a two-contour access model: an Open Contour (OC) for public LLMs and an Internal Contour (IC) for corporate/individual models, separated by a gateway for filtered interactions. A mandatory Request Control Module (RCM) monitors all user-LLM exchanges, enforcing limits on request frequency, size, and content to block sensitive data transfers. Secure training mandates dataset cleaning, depersonalization, and documentation, approved by security leads. Key Security Requirements: Corporate LLMs in IC with firewalls and access controls; public ones restricted to OC. Network/Access: Encrypted channels, user authentication, and logging for audits. Availability: Overload protection via RCM limits and reservations. Threat Analysis - drawing from OWASP Top 10 for LLMs (v1.1), it covers prompt injection (LLM01), data poisoning (LLM03), insecure output (LLM02 leading to XSS/SSRF), excess requests (LLM04/06), model theft (LLM10), and info disclosure. The dual-contour setup mitigates many via filtering and separation but notes limits against sophisticated attacks or human errors. Recommends DevSecOps pipelines integrating security across plan, develop, build, test, deploy, and monitor stages (e.g., SAST/DAST, SCA). Tables detail threat coverage, architecture strengths (e.g., centralized monitoring), and weaknesses (e.g., public model opacity). In conclusion, these practical guidelines enhance LLM resilience in enterprises, aligning with NIST AI RMF and ENISA practices, while calling for further automated vulnerability tools.

Science Discovery Artificial IntelligenceVol. 1(2)
Russian State Social University (RU), Marselisborgcentret (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Big Data and Digital Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.