Climate Negotiations Under Scrutiny: Are <scp>UNFCCC COPs</scp> Up To the Challenge?

ABSTRACT The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) plays a crucial role in global efforts to tackle the climate crisis. At annual Conferences of the Parties (COPs) and intersessional meetings, the international community gathers to advance climate policy and action. However, the negative consequences of a warming planet become more and more evident, whereas multilateral negotiations to tackle the climate crisis are falling short of what is needed. This article provides an integrative assessment of the existing reform options of the COP in terms of their implications for both democracy and effectiveness. We find that the most concrete reform options often involve practical difficulties or trade‐offs. Moreover, although some smaller reforms (such as capacity building or agenda streamlining) are achievable, larger reforms such as increasing meaningful nonparty stakeholder engagement remain difficult to achieve. The biggest stumbling block for any significant reform lies in the UNFCCC decision‐making procedures, namely the consensus requirement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70172
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Negotiations Under Scrutiny: Are UNFCCC COPs Up To the Challenge?

Jan Karlas, Franziska Petri
Global Policy
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Climate Negotiations Under Scrutiny: Are UNFCCC COPs Up To the Challenge?

Jan Karlas, Franziska Petri
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) plays a crucial role in global efforts to tackle the climate crisis. At annual Conferences of the Parties (COPs) and intersessional meetings, the international community gathers to advance climate policy and action. However, the negative consequences of a warming planet become more and more evident, whereas multilateral negotiations to tackle the climate crisis are falling short of what is needed. This article provides an integrative assessment of the existing reform options of the COP in terms of their implications for both democracy and effectiveness. We find that the most concrete reform options often involve practical difficulties or trade‐offs. Moreover, although some smaller reforms (such as capacity building or agenda streamlining) are achievable, larger reforms such as increasing meaningful nonparty stakeholder engagement remain difficult to achieve. The biggest stumbling block for any significant reform lies in the UNFCCC decision‐making procedures, namely the consensus requirement.

Global Policy
Charles University (CZ), Institute of Political Studies (PL), KU Leuven (BE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.