Initial Impact Velocity Prediction for Transport Packaging: An Artificial Neural Network Approach With Impact Angle Inference

ABSTRACT Current research on impact equivalence prediction for packaged goods primarily focuses on drop impacts. However, in express logistics, horizontal impacts on package faces or edges—caused by vehicle acceleration, cornering and braking—are more prevalent. Through horizontal impact tests, this study examines the effects of impact orientation, number of impacts and initial impact velocity on velocity change ( ΔV ) and impact angle inference. Results indicate that ΔV exhibits nonlinear growth with initial velocity and number of impacts across different orientations, stabilizing after approximately four impacts with accelerated stabilization at higher velocities. Impact angle inference is predominantly influenced by orientation. Accordingly, a γ ‐based impact angle inference method (utilizing normalized peak acceleration ratio) is proposed, achieving < 2° mean absolute error (MAE) in additional impact tests. Furthermore, five artificial neural network (ANN) prediction models were developed, utilizing impact type, impact angle, number of impacts and ΔV as input features, with initial impact velocity as the output target. Among these, the Particle Swarm Optimization‐Backpropagation Neural Network (PSO‐BPNN) demonstrated optimal performance: internal validation (696 datasets) yielded R 2 = 0.9280 and RMSE = 0.0547; external validation (24 independent datasets) showed maximum relative error < 3% with mean relative error of 0.83%. In six characteristic impact tests simulating postroad‐transport conditions, the PSO‐BPNN model predicted initial impact velocity with a mean error of 4.99%, significantly outperforming the effective drop height (EDH) method (15.37%). Furthermore, the model identified impact angles within < 3° mean error—a capability unattainable with EDH—establishing a novel methodology for characterizing transportation shock responses through standardized horizontal impact testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Packaging Technology and Science
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.70091
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Initial Impact Velocity Prediction for Transport Packaging: An Artificial Neural Network Approach With Impact Angle Inference

L Wang, Qingguo Chen, Cheng Yin, Bingbing Chang et al.
Packaging Technology and Science
Cellular and Composite Structures
article

Initial Impact Velocity Prediction for Transport Packaging: An Artificial Neural Network Approach With Impact Angle Inference

L Wang, Qingguo Chen, Cheng Yin, Bingbing Chang, Jing Qian
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Current research on impact equivalence prediction for packaged goods primarily focuses on drop impacts. However, in express logistics, horizontal impacts on package faces or edges—caused by vehicle acceleration, cornering and braking—are more prevalent. Through horizontal impact tests, this study examines the effects of impact orientation, number of impacts and initial impact velocity on velocity change ( ΔV ) and impact angle inference. Results indicate that ΔV exhibits nonlinear growth with initial velocity and number of impacts across different orientations, stabilizing after approximately four impacts with accelerated stabilization at higher velocities. Impact angle inference is predominantly influenced by orientation. Accordingly, a γ ‐based impact angle inference method (utilizing normalized peak acceleration ratio) is proposed, achieving < 2° mean absolute error (MAE) in additional impact tests. Furthermore, five artificial neural network (ANN) prediction models were developed, utilizing impact type, impact angle, number of impacts and ΔV as input features, with initial impact velocity as the output target. Among these, the Particle Swarm Optimization‐Backpropagation Neural Network (PSO‐BPNN) demonstrated optimal performance: internal validation (696 datasets) yielded R 2 = 0.9280 and RMSE = 0.0547; external validation (24 independent datasets) showed maximum relative error < 3% with mean relative error of 0.83%. In six characteristic impact tests simulating postroad‐transport conditions, the PSO‐BPNN model predicted initial impact velocity with a mean error of 4.99%, significantly outperforming the effective drop height (EDH) method (15.37%). Furthermore, the model identified impact angles within < 3° mean error—a capability unattainable with EDH—establishing a novel methodology for characterizing transportation shock responses through standardized horizontal impact testing.

Packaging Technology and Science
Jiangnan University (CN), Huangshan University (CN), Jiangsu Key Laboratory of 3D Printing Equipment and Manufacturing (CN), State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cellular and Composite Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.