Bounds, Benefits, and Bad Air: Net Benefits of Pollution Alerts

Abstract Though air-quality alert systems (AQAS) cover more than 1.7 billion people worldwide, there has been little analysis of the net benefits of these systems. This paper presents a theoretical framework for deriving lower bounds on the net benefits of an AQAS and applies it to a South Korean system currently covering over 51 million people. Estimating a regression discontinuity design, we find that an alert issuance reduced youth respiratory expenditures by 30% and adult cardiovascular expenditures by 23%. The overall system reduced externalised health expenditures by 28.6 million dollars during 2016−2017, with a minimum benefit-cost ratio of 7.1:1. Including dynamic impacts of alerts increases the minimum benefits (benefit-cost ratio) to 36.7 million dollars (9.2:1). Our findings imply that the AQAS generates significant net benefits and suggests that manipulation of air quality data, which has been observed in other contexts, may negatively impact social net benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueag056
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bounds, Benefits, and Bad Air: Net Benefits of Pollution Alerts

Michael Anderson, Minwoo Hyun, Jaecheol Lee
The Economic Journal
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Bounds, Benefits, and Bad Air: Net Benefits of Pollution Alerts

Michael Anderson, Minwoo Hyun, Jaecheol Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Though air-quality alert systems (AQAS) cover more than 1.7 billion people worldwide, there has been little analysis of the net benefits of these systems. This paper presents a theoretical framework for deriving lower bounds on the net benefits of an AQAS and applies it to a South Korean system currently covering over 51 million people. Estimating a regression discontinuity design, we find that an alert issuance reduced youth respiratory expenditures by 30% and adult cardiovascular expenditures by 23%. The overall system reduced externalised health expenditures by 28.6 million dollars during 2016−2017, with a minimum benefit-cost ratio of 7.1:1. Including dynamic impacts of alerts increases the minimum benefits (benefit-cost ratio) to 36.7 million dollars (9.2:1). Our findings imply that the AQAS generates significant net benefits and suggests that manipulation of air quality data, which has been observed in other contexts, may negatively impact social net benefits.

The Economic Journal
National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Sogang University (KR), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.