Integration of reinforcement learning in robotic additive manufacturing control: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives

Reinforcement learning (RL) is emerging as a promising route to adaptive, data-driven control in robotic additive manufacturing (AM). This review surveys the literature on both traditional and RL-based controllers in AM and finds that, in the case of RL applications, most studies prioritise toolpath optimisation or process-parameter tuning over robotic feedback control, such as motion-platform actuation or power-source regulation, and that the majority remain confined to simulation studies. Only a small, though growing, subset attempts closed-loop control of melt-pool dynamics, bead geometry, or thermal profiles—objectives that are central to the production of high-quality AM parts. Where evaluated, RL demonstrates the ability to exploit high-dimensional sensing to manage nonlinear, multivariable interactions, thereby improving tracking performance, robustness, and part quality. Following an in-depth examination of the state of the art in both traditional controllers and RL applications, this survey identifies and analyses the main barriers to industrial deployment, including the lack of formal stability and safety guarantees, sim-to-real mismatch and sample inefficiency, closed vendor platforms with limited low-latency actuation, and millisecond-scale real-time constraints on edge hardware. Finally, potential solutions to these challenges are discussed, including hybrid RL-traditional control architectures, data-efficient learning with digital twins and reduced-order models, offline RL and human-informed initialisation to minimise on-machine exploration, explainable RL for policy transparency, and hierarchical integration that incorporates additional Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based software modules such as in situ monitoring and anomaly detection to move beyond set-point regulation. Exploring these solutions could harness the most advanced AI techniques in manufacturing to improve learning efficiency, enhance the quality and reliability of feedback controllers, and increase policy interpretability for certification purposes in AM.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2026.04.069
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of reinforcement learning in robotic additive manufacturing control: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives

Eleni Manoli, Ethan Canzini, Giulio Mattera, Luigi Nele
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Integration of reinforcement learning in robotic additive manufacturing control: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives

Eleni Manoli, Ethan Canzini, Giulio Mattera, Luigi Nele
article en

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) is emerging as a promising route to adaptive, data-driven control in robotic additive manufacturing (AM). This review surveys the literature on both traditional and RL-based controllers in AM and finds that, in the case of RL applications, most studies prioritise toolpath optimisation or process-parameter tuning over robotic feedback control, such as motion-platform actuation or power-source regulation, and that the majority remain confined to simulation studies. Only a small, though growing, subset attempts closed-loop control of melt-pool dynamics, bead geometry, or thermal profiles—objectives that are central to the production of high-quality AM parts. Where evaluated, RL demonstrates the ability to exploit high-dimensional sensing to manage nonlinear, multivariable interactions, thereby improving tracking performance, robustness, and part quality. Following an in-depth examination of the state of the art in both traditional controllers and RL applications, this survey identifies and analyses the main barriers to industrial deployment, including the lack of formal stability and safety guarantees, sim-to-real mismatch and sample inefficiency, closed vendor platforms with limited low-latency actuation, and millisecond-scale real-time constraints on edge hardware. Finally, potential solutions to these challenges are discussed, including hybrid RL-traditional control architectures, data-efficient learning with digital twins and reduced-order models, offline RL and human-informed initialisation to minimise on-machine exploration, explainable RL for policy transparency, and hierarchical integration that incorporates additional Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based software modules such as in situ monitoring and anomaly detection to move beyond set-point regulation. Exploring these solutions could harness the most advanced AI techniques in manufacturing to improve learning efficiency, enhance the quality and reliability of feedback controllers, and increase policy interpretability for certification purposes in AM.

Journal of Manufacturing ProcessesVol. 169
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integration of reinforcement learning in robotic additive manufacturing control: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives — Eleni Manoli, Ethan Canzini, et al. · Journal of Manufacturing Processes (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS