Procedure for refinement of the height component in Real-Time Kinematic GNSS

Abstract The Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) method of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) technology allows the position of points to be determined with centimeter accuracy. The vertical component of the position is determined less accurately than the horizontal component. Two cases were analyzed to ensure higher accuracy of the vertical component on a set of test measurements obtained using 11 GNSS receivers under different observation conditions, at different times of day, with different vector lengths, and different averaging lengths. In the first case, it was found that if the maximum elevation angle – the elevation angle of the satellite closest to the zenith – is greater than 70°, better accuracy of the vertical component is achieved for most of the tested GNSS receivers. In the second case, it was found that averaging measurements at three specified times of day – 6 a.m., 3 p.m., and 9 p.m. – ensures greater accuracy of the vertical component, whose unit mean error is 21 % lower than the unit mean error of a single height measurement. The accuracy of the final average of three measurements is 54 % higher than the accuracy of a single measurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2026-0017
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedure for refinement of the height component in Real-Time Kinematic GNSS

Jakub Kostelecký
Journal of Applied Geodesy
GNSS positioning and interference
article

Procedure for refinement of the height component in Real-Time Kinematic GNSS

Jakub Kostelecký
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) method of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) technology allows the position of points to be determined with centimeter accuracy. The vertical component of the position is determined less accurately than the horizontal component. Two cases were analyzed to ensure higher accuracy of the vertical component on a set of test measurements obtained using 11 GNSS receivers under different observation conditions, at different times of day, with different vector lengths, and different averaging lengths. In the first case, it was found that if the maximum elevation angle – the elevation angle of the satellite closest to the zenith – is greater than 70°, better accuracy of the vertical component is achieved for most of the tested GNSS receivers. In the second case, it was found that averaging measurements at three specified times of day – 6 a.m., 3 p.m., and 9 p.m. – ensures greater accuracy of the vertical component, whose unit mean error is 21 % lower than the unit mean error of a single height measurement. The accuracy of the final average of three measurements is 54 % higher than the accuracy of a single measurement.

Journal of Applied Geodesy
Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Procedure for refinement of the height component in Real-Time Kinematic GNSS — Jakub Kostelecký · Journal of Applied Geodesy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS