A quantitative framework for subsurface uncertainty assessment using multidisciplinary geoscientific data

This study introduces the Integrated Model Coherence Index (IMCI), a novel conceptual framework for quantifying the reliability of multi-method subsurface geoscientific models. While joint inversion techniques focus on identifying a best-fit model that minimizes global error, they often show disagreements between independent datasets. The IMCI addresses this limitation by focusing on interpretational convergence, measuring how different data streams (geological/remote sensing, geophysical, and geochemical/borehole) predict the same subsurface properties, thereby transforming qualitative, multidisciplinary observations into a quantitative, risk-based metric. The output is a 3D confidence cube, in which each voxel is assigned a normalized reliability score. High-confidence zones indicate mutual reinforcement between data streams, while low-confidence areas highlight ambiguity. This can guide targeted data acquisition and help de-risk exploration in fields such as natural resource exploration and management, as well as hazard assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MethodsX
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103934
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A quantitative framework for subsurface uncertainty assessment using multidisciplinary geoscientific data

Konstantinos Chavanidis, Israa S. Abu-Mahfouz
MethodsX
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
article

A quantitative framework for subsurface uncertainty assessment using multidisciplinary geoscientific data

Konstantinos Chavanidis, Israa S. Abu-Mahfouz
article en

Abstract

This study introduces the Integrated Model Coherence Index (IMCI), a novel conceptual framework for quantifying the reliability of multi-method subsurface geoscientific models. While joint inversion techniques focus on identifying a best-fit model that minimizes global error, they often show disagreements between independent datasets. The IMCI addresses this limitation by focusing on interpretational convergence, measuring how different data streams (geological/remote sensing, geophysical, and geochemical/borehole) predict the same subsurface properties, thereby transforming qualitative, multidisciplinary observations into a quantitative, risk-based metric. The output is a 3D confidence cube, in which each voxel is assigned a normalized reliability score. High-confidence zones indicate mutual reinforcement between data streams, while low-confidence areas highlight ambiguity. This can guide targeted data acquisition and help de-risk exploration in fields such as natural resource exploration and management, as well as hazard assessment.

MethodsXVol. 16
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A quantitative framework for subsurface uncertainty assessment using multidisciplinary geoscientific data — Konstantinos Chavanidis, Israa S. Abu-Mahfouz · MethodsX (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS