A novel framework for monitoring, evaluating, and learning from transdisciplinary research

<ns3:p>Background Monitoring and evaluation are crucial yet often underdeveloped components of transdisciplinary research. Transdisciplinary research aims to bridge disciplinary boundaries, engage partners, and deliver societal impact, but there are limited approaches to assess transdisciplinary research processes and the variety of impacts that arise from such projects. Methods This paper presents a novel framework for the evaluation of transdisciplinary research projects: a Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Plan (MELP) designed specifically for transdisciplinary research contexts, drawing on climate and health research as an illustrative case. We conceptualised the MELP by reviewing transdisciplinary research evaluation literature and the illustrative case’s programme theory. The literature review collated the most relevant evaluation principles and criteria from fundamental evaluation works and aligned these with the programme’s intended underlying action model and anticipated impacts. Further development steps included aligning evaluation focus with the project’s enabling conditions and ethical considerations, identified through a project documentation review and finally proposing a structure for the evaluation plan and testing it with the research teams and partners involved in a project on climate and health. Results The resulting framework is structured around four phases of transdisciplinary research: (i) formation, (ii) formulation, (iii) investigation, and (iv) translation. Within our evaluation framework, each phase has proposed criteria, sub-criteria, guiding questions, and suggested methods for data collection. For projects taking a transdisciplinary research approach, the MELP enables systematic data collection and ongoing reflection. At a localised level within projects (i.e. for work packages), it offers a flexible approach to encourage collaboration within the evaluation process, and opportunities to adapt project activities based on real-time learning. In this paper, we reflect on the application of the MELP within a transdisciplinary research project - Policy and Implementation for Climate and Health Equity (PAICE) - highlighting how it supports continuous learning and alignment between research processes and their wider societal goals. Conclusion By providing a transferable yet adaptable approach, the MELP offers a practical approach to aid the practice of transdisciplinary research is effective, whilst building theory on transdisciplinary research itself.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.25882.1
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel framework for monitoring, evaluating, and learning from transdisciplinary research

David Osrin, Giorgos Petrou, GE Moore, Simon Vakeva-Baird et al.
Wellcome Open Research
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

A novel framework for monitoring, evaluating, and learning from transdisciplinary research

David Osrin, Giorgos Petrou, GE Moore, Simon Vakeva-Baird, Ruth Unstead-Joss, Michael Davies, James Milner
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Monitoring and evaluation are crucial yet often underdeveloped components of transdisciplinary research. Transdisciplinary research aims to bridge disciplinary boundaries, engage partners, and deliver societal impact, but there are limited approaches to assess transdisciplinary research processes and the variety of impacts that arise from such projects. Methods This paper presents a novel framework for the evaluation of transdisciplinary research projects: a Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Plan (MELP) designed specifically for transdisciplinary research contexts, drawing on climate and health research as an illustrative case. We conceptualised the MELP by reviewing transdisciplinary research evaluation literature and the illustrative case’s programme theory. The literature review collated the most relevant evaluation principles and criteria from fundamental evaluation works and aligned these with the programme’s intended underlying action model and anticipated impacts. Further development steps included aligning evaluation focus with the project’s enabling conditions and ethical considerations, identified through a project documentation review and finally proposing a structure for the evaluation plan and testing it with the research teams and partners involved in a project on climate and health. Results The resulting framework is structured around four phases of transdisciplinary research: (i) formation, (ii) formulation, (iii) investigation, and (iv) translation. Within our evaluation framework, each phase has proposed criteria, sub-criteria, guiding questions, and suggested methods for data collection. For projects taking a transdisciplinary research approach, the MELP enables systematic data collection and ongoing reflection. At a localised level within projects (i.e. for work packages), it offers a flexible approach to encourage collaboration within the evaluation process, and opportunities to adapt project activities based on real-time learning. In this paper, we reflect on the application of the MELP within a transdisciplinary research project - Policy and Implementation for Climate and Health Equity (PAICE) - highlighting how it supports continuous learning and alignment between research processes and their wider societal goals. Conclusion By providing a transferable yet adaptable approach, the MELP offers a practical approach to aid the practice of transdisciplinary research is effective, whilst building theory on transdisciplinary research itself.</ns3:p>

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 11
The George Institute for Global Health (GB), Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), University College London (GB)
Wellcome Trust
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.