Periapical Complications Associated with Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Long-Term Clinical Evaluation

Objectives: Endodontic complications are among the most frequently reported biological complications in tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of periapical complications in FDPs placed on vital and non-vital abutments and to identify risk factors for these lesions. Methods: This retrospective clinical trial was conducted on participants who had attended routine follow-up visits at the dental hospital at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. Participants were examined clinically and radiographically for the presence of periapical lesions. Information was recorded on the design, material, location of the prostheses, and oral hygiene. The survival and lesion-free survival rates were determined using the Kaplan–Meier method. Life-table analysis was performed to assess the mean time to event. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess potential risk factors for the development of periapical lesions (α = 0.05). Results: A total of 495 FDPs were placed in 302 participants, with a mean age of 45.7 ± 13.4 years and a mean follow-up period of 7.5 ± 6.5 years. Lesions were detected in 32.3% of FDPs during follow-up. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of lesions in vital compared with non-vital abutments or between males and females (p > 0.05). Poor oral hygiene was the most significant risk factor for the development of periapical lesions (p < 0.05). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that anterior–posterior FDPs had a higher risk of lesions (p = 0.035). No significant associations were found between lesions and the material used or the design of the abutment (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Periapical complications in FDPs are mainly influenced by oral hygiene and the location of the FDPs, whereas abutment vitality and material type appear to have limited impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prosthesis
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis8050043
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Periapical Complications Associated with Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Long-Term Clinical Evaluation

Rana Altuwajri, Hanin Alsalhi, Ali Alenezi
Prosthesis
Dental materials and restorations
article

Periapical Complications Associated with Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Long-Term Clinical Evaluation

Rana Altuwajri, Hanin Alsalhi, Ali Alenezi
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Endodontic complications are among the most frequently reported biological complications in tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of periapical complications in FDPs placed on vital and non-vital abutments and to identify risk factors for these lesions. Methods: This retrospective clinical trial was conducted on participants who had attended routine follow-up visits at the dental hospital at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. Participants were examined clinically and radiographically for the presence of periapical lesions. Information was recorded on the design, material, location of the prostheses, and oral hygiene. The survival and lesion-free survival rates were determined using the Kaplan–Meier method. Life-table analysis was performed to assess the mean time to event. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess potential risk factors for the development of periapical lesions (α = 0.05). Results: A total of 495 FDPs were placed in 302 participants, with a mean age of 45.7 ± 13.4 years and a mean follow-up period of 7.5 ± 6.5 years. Lesions were detected in 32.3% of FDPs during follow-up. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of lesions in vital compared with non-vital abutments or between males and females (p > 0.05). Poor oral hygiene was the most significant risk factor for the development of periapical lesions (p < 0.05). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that anterior–posterior FDPs had a higher risk of lesions (p = 0.035). No significant associations were found between lesions and the material used or the design of the abutment (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Periapical complications in FDPs are mainly influenced by oral hygiene and the location of the FDPs, whereas abutment vitality and material type appear to have limited impact.

ProsthesisVol. 8(5)
Qassim University (SA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Periapical Complications Associated with Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Long-Term Clinical Evaluation — Rana Altuwajri, Hanin Alsalhi, et al. · Prosthesis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS