Mixed‐Mode Stress Intensity Factor Evaluation via Thermoelastic Stress Analysis Including Non‐Adiabatic Correction

ABSTRACT Characterization of the crack tip, such as the stress intensity factor (SIF), is a vital step for the assessment of fatigue crack growth and prediction of potential failure in engineering structures. This study investigates the use of thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) for SIF evaluation, including a methodology for non‐adiabatic stress field correction to overcome limitations that occur due to heat conduction. Finite element modeling is used to demonstrate the limits of the underlying mathematical procedure for Mode I and Mode II loading, including the effects of crack tip plasticity, loading frequency, and material thickness. Experimental validation is undertaken through fatigue crack growth experiments using modified disk‐shaped compact tension samples. The TSA based SIF evaluation technique with non‐adiabatic correction enables robust experimental validation of reference SIF solutions and finite element modeling, as well as a means for direct measurement in cases where theory solutions are not available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.70296
Primary Topic
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed‐Mode Stress Intensity Factor Evaluation via Thermoelastic Stress Analysis Including Non‐Adiabatic Correction

Lloyd Button, Stuart Wildy, John Codrington, Nik Rajic
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
article

Mixed‐Mode Stress Intensity Factor Evaluation via Thermoelastic Stress Analysis Including Non‐Adiabatic Correction

Lloyd Button, Stuart Wildy, John Codrington, Nik Rajic
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Characterization of the crack tip, such as the stress intensity factor (SIF), is a vital step for the assessment of fatigue crack growth and prediction of potential failure in engineering structures. This study investigates the use of thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) for SIF evaluation, including a methodology for non‐adiabatic stress field correction to overcome limitations that occur due to heat conduction. Finite element modeling is used to demonstrate the limits of the underlying mathematical procedure for Mode I and Mode II loading, including the effects of crack tip plasticity, loading frequency, and material thickness. Experimental validation is undertaken through fatigue crack growth experiments using modified disk‐shaped compact tension samples. The TSA based SIF evaluation technique with non‐adiabatic correction enables robust experimental validation of reference SIF solutions and finite element modeling, as well as a means for direct measurement in cases where theory solutions are not available.

Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
The University of Adelaide (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Fatigue and fracture mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mixed‐Mode Stress Intensity Factor Evaluation via Thermoelastic Stress Analysis Including Non‐Adiabatic Correction — Lloyd Button, Stuart Wildy, et al. · Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS