Effects of Hearing Intervention on Cognitive Function in Patients with Presbycusis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: This study aimed to systematically assess the impact of hearing interventions on cognitive function in older adults with presbycusis. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases from their inception to 22 June 2025 to identify eligible randomized clinical trials or cohort studies that used designated cognitive scales or cognitive test measures. Two separate meta-analyses were conducted: one using uncontrolled pre–post comparisons and another restricted to studies that included concurrent untreated control groups. Results: A total of 22 studies were identified, comprising 9 focused on hearing aid use and 13 on cochlear implantation. Ultimately, 19 studies were included in the quantitative analysis: 7 on hearing aid use and 12 on cochlear implantation. The pooled analysis of hearing intervention across 17 studies involving 1562 patients indicated a 4% improvement in cognitive test scores post-intervention compared with pre-intervention (ratio of means: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03–1.05; p < 0.001). However, in the 4 controlled studies that included an untreated comparator group (815 intervention, 7450 control participants), hearing intervention did not confer a statistically significant cognitive benefit over no intervention (SMD = 0.03; 95% CI: −0.04 to 0.09; p = 0.369). Conclusions: Current controlled evidence does not support the claim that hearing interventions preserve or enhance cognitive function in older adults with presbycusis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16030067
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Hearing Intervention on Cognitive Function in Patients with Presbycusis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yuxuan Li, Yang Beibei, Jia Chen, Luofei Zhang
Audiology Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Effects of Hearing Intervention on Cognitive Function in Patients with Presbycusis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yuxuan Li, Yang Beibei, Jia Chen, Luofei Zhang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to systematically assess the impact of hearing interventions on cognitive function in older adults with presbycusis. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases from their inception to 22 June 2025 to identify eligible randomized clinical trials or cohort studies that used designated cognitive scales or cognitive test measures. Two separate meta-analyses were conducted: one using uncontrolled pre–post comparisons and another restricted to studies that included concurrent untreated control groups. Results: A total of 22 studies were identified, comprising 9 focused on hearing aid use and 13 on cochlear implantation. Ultimately, 19 studies were included in the quantitative analysis: 7 on hearing aid use and 12 on cochlear implantation. The pooled analysis of hearing intervention across 17 studies involving 1562 patients indicated a 4% improvement in cognitive test scores post-intervention compared with pre-intervention (ratio of means: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03–1.05; p < 0.001). However, in the 4 controlled studies that included an untreated comparator group (815 intervention, 7450 control participants), hearing intervention did not confer a statistically significant cognitive benefit over no intervention (SMD = 0.03; 95% CI: −0.04 to 0.09; p = 0.369). Conclusions: Current controlled evidence does not support the claim that hearing interventions preserve or enhance cognitive function in older adults with presbycusis.

Audiology ResearchVol. 16(3)
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.