The Paradox of Digital Monitoring: A Cross-Sectional Study of mHealth Adoption and Its Association with Psychological Distress Among Pregnant Women in Romania

Background: Digital health (mHealth) interventions are increasingly integrated into maternity care to improve health literacy and reassure expectant mothers. However, the “double-edged sword” of continuous monitoring may be associated with heightened anxiety. This study aimed to describe mHealth usage patterns and investigate the association between technology engagement and mental health outcomes among pregnant women in Romania, where perinatal distress is a significant public health challenge. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study included 100 pregnant and immediate postpartum women at a tertiary maternity unit in Romania. Participants were stratified into mHealth Users (n = 52) and Non-Users (n = 48). Validated instruments, including the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and EPDS, assessed depressive and anxiety symptoms. Predictors of adoption were identified using multivariable binary logistic regression. Results: mHealth users were predominantly from urban environments (80.8% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.004) and reported higher rates of daily physical activity (p < 0.001). Users experienced significantly higher median scores for depression (PHQ-9: 6 vs. 4, p = 0.047), generalized anxiety (GAD-7: 7 vs. 6, p = 0.015), and pregnancy-specific anxiety (35 vs. 29.5, p = 0.028) compared to non-users. In the multivariable model, high psychological distress (OR 0.08 for low-stress vs. high-stress, p = 0.009) and urban residency (p = 0.043) were independent predictors of mHealth adoption. Notably, 96.2% of users shared their digital data with healthcare providers. Conclusions: mHealth adoption in this population is characterized by a “paradox of monitoring,” where usage is strongly associated with pre-existing psychological vulnerability and associated with higher distress. While these tools serve as markers for mental health risk, the high rate of data sharing offers a clinical opportunity for a hybrid model of care. Obstetricians should view high digital engagement as a prompt for targeted mental health screening and proactively mediate patient-generated data to mitigate anxiety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091216
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Paradox of Digital Monitoring: A Cross-Sectional Study of mHealth Adoption and Its Association with Psychological Distress Among Pregnant Women in Romania

A. Constantin, Roxana Ana Maria Dinescu, Paul-Manuel Luminosu, Ioan Sas et al.
Healthcare
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

The Paradox of Digital Monitoring: A Cross-Sectional Study of mHealth Adoption and Its Association with Psychological Distress Among Pregnant Women in Romania

A. Constantin, Roxana Ana Maria Dinescu, Paul-Manuel Luminosu, Ioan Sas, Alexandru Cătălin Motofelea
article en

Abstract

Background: Digital health (mHealth) interventions are increasingly integrated into maternity care to improve health literacy and reassure expectant mothers. However, the “double-edged sword” of continuous monitoring may be associated with heightened anxiety. This study aimed to describe mHealth usage patterns and investigate the association between technology engagement and mental health outcomes among pregnant women in Romania, where perinatal distress is a significant public health challenge. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study included 100 pregnant and immediate postpartum women at a tertiary maternity unit in Romania. Participants were stratified into mHealth Users (n = 52) and Non-Users (n = 48). Validated instruments, including the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and EPDS, assessed depressive and anxiety symptoms. Predictors of adoption were identified using multivariable binary logistic regression. Results: mHealth users were predominantly from urban environments (80.8% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.004) and reported higher rates of daily physical activity (p < 0.001). Users experienced significantly higher median scores for depression (PHQ-9: 6 vs. 4, p = 0.047), generalized anxiety (GAD-7: 7 vs. 6, p = 0.015), and pregnancy-specific anxiety (35 vs. 29.5, p = 0.028) compared to non-users. In the multivariable model, high psychological distress (OR 0.08 for low-stress vs. high-stress, p = 0.009) and urban residency (p = 0.043) were independent predictors of mHealth adoption. Notably, 96.2% of users shared their digital data with healthcare providers. Conclusions: mHealth adoption in this population is characterized by a “paradox of monitoring,” where usage is strongly associated with pre-existing psychological vulnerability and associated with higher distress. While these tools serve as markers for mental health risk, the high rate of data sharing offers a clinical opportunity for a hybrid model of care. Obstetricians should view high digital engagement as a prompt for targeted mental health screening and proactively mediate patient-generated data to mitigate anxiety.

HealthcareVol. 14(9)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Spitalul Clinic Judeţean de Urgenţă "Pius Brînzeu" Timişoara (RO), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.