Development of the Sahara Attitude Scale Towards Violence Against Women and Examination of Its Psychometric Characteristics

Background: Violence against women remains a critical global public health and human rights issue. Although several tools have been developed to assess attitudes toward violence against women, existing scales are often limited in scope, population coverage, or psychometric strength. Methods: This study addresses this gap by developing and validating the Sahara Attitude Scale Towards Violence Against Women for individuals aged 18 and above. The development process of the scale consisted of the following stages: content validity, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, reliability studies, validation of the obtained structure, and test-retest reliability. Data were collected through Google Forms from 360 individuals with different sociocultural backgrounds for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 336 individuals for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: As a result of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, a two-factor, 12-item structure was obtained. The scale explains 76.3% of the variance, with Cronbach’s α of 0.94, Gutman’s 0.95, and McDonald’s Omega ω of 0.96. The fit indices for the construct [χ2/df = 2.726, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.072, comparative fit indices (CFI) = 0.97, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.93, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.90, and normed fit index (NFI) = 0.96] were found to be at an adequate level. The legitimization factor reflects individuals’ tendency to view actions such as violence, harassment, or mistreatment toward women as legitimate, understandable, or justified for various reasons. This factor consists of 1–6 items, explaining 63.2% of the variance, with Cronbach’s α of 0.94, Gutman’s 0.94, and McDonald’s Omega ω of 0.92. The control factor represents a perspective that considers it legitimate to restrict women’s freedom, establish control over them, and constantly monitor their actions. This factor consists of items 7–12 and explains 13.1% of the variance, with Cronbach’s α of 0.92, Gutman’s 0.91, and McDonald’s Omega ω of 0.94. Conclusions: The Sahara Attitude Scale Towards Violence Against Women is a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Strongly Disagree, 4 = Strongly Agree). There are no reverse-scored items in the scale. The total scale score is obtained by summing the scores of all items, and the raw score ranges from 0 to 48 points. The raw score must be standardized to a range of 0–100 points in accordance with the guidelines. Higher scale scores indicate stronger attitudes supporting violence against women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/bp44933
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the Sahara Attitude Scale Towards Violence Against Women and Examination of Its Psychometric Characteristics

Elçin Babaoğlu, Yalçın Kanbay, Aysun Akçam, Suna Köse et al.
Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Development of the Sahara Attitude Scale Towards Violence Against Women and Examination of Its Psychometric Characteristics

Elçin Babaoğlu, Yalçın Kanbay, Aysun Akçam, Suna Köse, Hatice Karakuş Öztürk
article en

Abstract

Background: Violence against women remains a critical global public health and human rights issue. Although several tools have been developed to assess attitudes toward violence against women, existing scales are often limited in scope, population coverage, or psychometric strength. Methods: This study addresses this gap by developing and validating the Sahara Attitude Scale Towards Violence Against Women for individuals aged 18 and above. The development process of the scale consisted of the following stages: content validity, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, reliability studies, validation of the obtained structure, and test-retest reliability. Data were collected through Google Forms from 360 individuals with different sociocultural backgrounds for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 336 individuals for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: As a result of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, a two-factor, 12-item structure was obtained. The scale explains 76.3% of the variance, with Cronbach’s α of 0.94, Gutman’s 0.95, and McDonald’s Omega ω of 0.96. The fit indices for the construct [χ2/df = 2.726, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.072, comparative fit indices (CFI) = 0.97, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.93, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.90, and normed fit index (NFI) = 0.96] were found to be at an adequate level. The legitimization factor reflects individuals’ tendency to view actions such as violence, harassment, or mistreatment toward women as legitimate, understandable, or justified for various reasons. This factor consists of 1–6 items, explaining 63.2% of the variance, with Cronbach’s α of 0.94, Gutman’s 0.94, and McDonald’s Omega ω of 0.92. The control factor represents a perspective that considers it legitimate to restrict women’s freedom, establish control over them, and constantly monitor their actions. This factor consists of items 7–12 and explains 13.1% of the variance, with Cronbach’s α of 0.92, Gutman’s 0.91, and McDonald’s Omega ω of 0.94. Conclusions: The Sahara Attitude Scale Towards Violence Against Women is a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Strongly Disagree, 4 = Strongly Agree). There are no reverse-scored items in the scale. The total scale score is obtained by summing the scores of all items, and the raw score ranges from 0 to 48 points. The raw score must be standardized to a range of 0–100 points in accordance with the guidelines. Higher scale scores indicate stronger attitudes supporting violence against women.

Behavioral Psychology/Psicología ConductualVol. 34(2)
Üsküdar University (TR), Artvin Coruh University (TR), Eskişehir City Hospital (TR), Turkish Society of Cardiology (TR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.