Global drivers of size variation in patellid limpets and their implications for marine protection and conservation outcomes

Coastal ecosystems support high biodiversity and provide essential habitats for marine organisms. Limpets are key intertidal grazers that regulate algal dynamics, and their size structure is highly sensitive to harvesting pressure, habitat characteristics, and local environmental conditions, making them useful indicators of human impact and management effectiveness. We conducted a cross-regional, multi-ocean comparison of limpet shell length to evaluate how protection status (No-take vs. Harvested), substrate type, and spatial scale influence size distributions. The dataset comprised 95,809 individuals from 12 species in three genera (Cymbula, Patella, and Scutellastra), spanning Madeira (Portugal), the Canary Islands (Spain), the western Mediterranean and Strait of Gibraltar (Alborán Island, Ceuta, La Línea), the Pacific coast of Mexico (Jalisco and Nayarit), and South Africa (Southern Benguela and Agulhas bioregions). Generalized Linear Mixed Models with hierarchical spatial structure revealed an overall positive effect of protection, with individuals significantly larger in No-take areas across the global model, although responses varied among species and regions. Harvested species most consistently attained larger sizes under protection, whereas non-targeted taxa exhibited weak or context-dependent responses, reflecting differences in exploitation history and ecological interactions. Substrate effects were generally smaller but contributed to local variation in size structure. Variance partitioning indicated that most size variability occurred among sites rather than among regions, highlighting the dominant role of fine-scale environmental conditions, harvesting intensity, and enforcement effectiveness in shaping population size structure. These findings demonstrate that while No-take areas contribute to maintaining larger individuals, conservation outcomes depend strongly on site-level ecological and management contexts. Effective conservation of intertidal assemblages therefore requires site-specific strategies that integrate protection measures with local habitat conditions and enforcement capacity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04222
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global drivers of size variation in patellid limpets and their implications for marine protection and conservation outcomes

Ricardo Sousa, Free Espinosa, Maya C. Pfaff, José Luís Carballo et al.
Global Ecology and Conservation
Marine and coastal plant biology
article

Global drivers of size variation in patellid limpets and their implications for marine protection and conservation outcomes

Ricardo Sousa, Free Espinosa, Maya C. Pfaff, José Luís Carballo, Rodrigo Riera, Alejandro Espada-Pastor, Ana Carolina Galdino Pinto, George M. Branch, Joana Vasconcelos, Ndiviwe G. Baliwe, Jesús Emilio Michel Morfin
article en

Abstract

Coastal ecosystems support high biodiversity and provide essential habitats for marine organisms. Limpets are key intertidal grazers that regulate algal dynamics, and their size structure is highly sensitive to harvesting pressure, habitat characteristics, and local environmental conditions, making them useful indicators of human impact and management effectiveness. We conducted a cross-regional, multi-ocean comparison of limpet shell length to evaluate how protection status (No-take vs. Harvested), substrate type, and spatial scale influence size distributions. The dataset comprised 95,809 individuals from 12 species in three genera (Cymbula, Patella, and Scutellastra), spanning Madeira (Portugal), the Canary Islands (Spain), the western Mediterranean and Strait of Gibraltar (Alborán Island, Ceuta, La Línea), the Pacific coast of Mexico (Jalisco and Nayarit), and South Africa (Southern Benguela and Agulhas bioregions). Generalized Linear Mixed Models with hierarchical spatial structure revealed an overall positive effect of protection, with individuals significantly larger in No-take areas across the global model, although responses varied among species and regions. Harvested species most consistently attained larger sizes under protection, whereas non-targeted taxa exhibited weak or context-dependent responses, reflecting differences in exploitation history and ecological interactions. Substrate effects were generally smaller but contributed to local variation in size structure. Variance partitioning indicated that most size variability occurred among sites rather than among regions, highlighting the dominant role of fine-scale environmental conditions, harvesting intensity, and enforcement effectiveness in shaping population size structure. These findings demonstrate that while No-take areas contribute to maintaining larger individuals, conservation outcomes depend strongly on site-level ecological and management contexts. Effective conservation of intertidal assemblages therefore requires site-specific strategies that integrate protection measures with local habitat conditions and enforcement capacity.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 68
Consejería de Educación, Universidades y Sostenibilidad, Gobierno de Canarias, University of Cape Town, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Marine and coastal plant biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.