Unified Estimation of Conditional Distortion Risk Measures and Expectiles in APARCH‐X Models

ABSTRACT This paper develops a unified asymptotic framework for estimating conditional distortion risk measures and conditional expectiles within the APARCH‐X model. The proposed framework extends that of Hoga ( International Journal of Forecasting 37, 675‐686, 2021), which focuses exclusively on extreme tail levels, by allowing for both extreme and intermediate tail regimes through a single asymptotic condition, , where is the risk level and corresponds to the extreme case and to the intermediate case. Building on extreme value theory, we derive the asymptotic distributions of the proposed estimators and show that the limiting variances differ structurally across the two regimes. The extreme case studied in Hoga (2021) is thereby recovered as a special instance. In addition, we establish a uniform limit theory over a continuum of tail levels, which facilitates the construction of confidence bands for conditional tail risk measures. Empirically, we apply the proposed methodology to daily returns of four major equity indices and incorporate Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) volatility indices as exogenous variables. The results show that including these volatility measures leads to statistically significant improvements in forecasting accuracy for conditional tail risk measures, particularly during crisis periods, as evidenced by Diebold–Mariano tests. Moreover, the model confidence set procedure consistently favours the APARCH‐X specification over conventional alternatives, including APARCH, AR‐GARCH and GARCH models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anzs.70051
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unified Estimation of Conditional Distortion Risk Measures and Expectiles in APARCH‐X Models

Bo Wei, Yaolan Ma, Jinjin He
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
article

Unified Estimation of Conditional Distortion Risk Measures and Expectiles in APARCH‐X Models

Bo Wei, Yaolan Ma, Jinjin He
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper develops a unified asymptotic framework for estimating conditional distortion risk measures and conditional expectiles within the APARCH‐X model. The proposed framework extends that of Hoga ( International Journal of Forecasting 37, 675‐686, 2021), which focuses exclusively on extreme tail levels, by allowing for both extreme and intermediate tail regimes through a single asymptotic condition, , where is the risk level and corresponds to the extreme case and to the intermediate case. Building on extreme value theory, we derive the asymptotic distributions of the proposed estimators and show that the limiting variances differ structurally across the two regimes. The extreme case studied in Hoga (2021) is thereby recovered as a special instance. In addition, we establish a uniform limit theory over a continuum of tail levels, which facilitates the construction of confidence bands for conditional tail risk measures. Empirically, we apply the proposed methodology to daily returns of four major equity indices and incorporate Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) volatility indices as exogenous variables. The results show that including these volatility measures leads to statistically significant improvements in forecasting accuracy for conditional tail risk measures, particularly during crisis periods, as evidenced by Diebold–Mariano tests. Moreover, the model confidence set procedure consistently favours the APARCH‐X specification over conventional alternatives, including APARCH, AR‐GARCH and GARCH models.

Australian & New Zealand Journal of StatisticsVol. 68(2)
North Minzu University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.