Does South–South Cooperation Deliver? The Economic Impacts of <scp>BRICS</scp> Plus Platform

ABSTRACT This study investigates whether South–South cooperation delivers tangible economic benefits by examining the impact of the BRICS Plus platform on the economic development of participating countries. Using national‐level panel data for 125 countries from 2009 to 2022 and applying a staggered Difference‐in‐Differences approach, we find that BRICS Plus participation is associated with an average annual GDP per capita growth rate increase of approximately 3.42% compared to non‐participating countries on the same continent. Mechanism analysis suggests that the positive effect is driven by enhanced foreign direct investment, improvements in trade balances, and expanded financing channels, with India and China playing leading roles through investment, and South Africa contributing through regional financing. Participation is also linked to improved governance and reductions in civil conflicts but shows no significant increase in aid inflows from other international organizations. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the positive economic effects are concentrated in Asian and African countries, among low‐ and lower‐middle‐income economies with higher agricultural shares, and in countries with stronger initial infrastructure. Overall, the results provide empirical support for the developmental potential of institutionalized South–South cooperation through platforms like BRICS Plus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Economy
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.70100
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does South–South Cooperation Deliver? The Economic Impacts of BRICS Plus Platform

F. W. Shi, Qingxin Lan, Peng Ma, Yutong Ji et al.
World Economy
International Development and Aid
article

Does South–South Cooperation Deliver? The Economic Impacts of BRICS Plus Platform

F. W. Shi, Qingxin Lan, Peng Ma, Yutong Ji, Ya Tan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates whether South–South cooperation delivers tangible economic benefits by examining the impact of the BRICS Plus platform on the economic development of participating countries. Using national‐level panel data for 125 countries from 2009 to 2022 and applying a staggered Difference‐in‐Differences approach, we find that BRICS Plus participation is associated with an average annual GDP per capita growth rate increase of approximately 3.42% compared to non‐participating countries on the same continent. Mechanism analysis suggests that the positive effect is driven by enhanced foreign direct investment, improvements in trade balances, and expanded financing channels, with India and China playing leading roles through investment, and South Africa contributing through regional financing. Participation is also linked to improved governance and reductions in civil conflicts but shows no significant increase in aid inflows from other international organizations. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the positive economic effects are concentrated in Asian and African countries, among low‐ and lower‐middle‐income economies with higher agricultural shares, and in countries with stronger initial infrastructure. Overall, the results provide empirical support for the developmental potential of institutionalized South–South cooperation through platforms like BRICS Plus.

World Economy
University of International Business and Economics (CN), China National Chemical Corporation (China) (CN), Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation (CN), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Social Science Fund of China
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.