Seafloor to Borehole CSEM: A 3D Modelling Study of Survey Sensitivity to Small Resistive Targets in Shallow Water

Marine controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) surveys have been proven to be an effective tool in hydrocarbon exploration, principally due to the method’s ability (in the right circumstances) to identify electrical resistivity contrasts between hydrocarbon-saturated and brine-saturated sedimentary units. However, the sensitivity of such surveys decreases in shallow water, for deeper targets, and for targets with limited horizontal extent. In principle, the resolution and sensitivity of a survey can be improved by moving either the transmitting or the receiving dipoles into the sub-surface. We have therefore investigated the sensitivity of Seafloor to Borehole CSEM (sbCSEM) survey geometries, specifically for the case of simplified targets with small lateral dimensions in shallow water areas—including targets whose depth of burial substantially exceeds their lateral extent. The results are encouraging. Neither small target size nor shallow water presents obstacles in principle to the use of this approach. Our models reveal distinct lobes in the patterns of electric field and current density amplitudes around a sub-seafloor transmitting dipole. The shape, positions and amplitudes of these lobes are all strongly modified by the presence of one or more small resistive targets, and they are strongly influenced by the positions of target edges. These effects significantly modify the pattern of electric fields at the seafloor and hence result in good sensitivity for realistic survey geometries. Small targets can be detected by seafloor receivers when the sub-seafloor transmitting dipole is located at some distance laterally outside the targets—leading to potential applications in ‘step-out’ prospecting. The asymmetry of responses at the seafloor from targets that are offset with respect to transmitter location has potential applications in field appraisal, while monitoring of reservoirs during production provides another possible application. Varying the depth of the transmitter down the borehole generates a Vertical EM Profiling (VEMP) survey—analogous to Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP)—and we demonstrate that this too can have useful applications. Modelling for deeper (3 km sub-seafloor) targets continues to yield encouraging results and suggests that step-out sbCSEM may be effective at depths beyond the detection limit of conventional seafloor–seafloor CSEM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16050178
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seafloor to Borehole CSEM: A 3D Modelling Study of Survey Sensitivity to Small Resistive Targets in Shallow Water

Vikas C Baranwal, L. M. MacGregor, M. C. Sinha, Anna C. Maxey et al.
Geosciences
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Seafloor to Borehole CSEM: A 3D Modelling Study of Survey Sensitivity to Small Resistive Targets in Shallow Water

Vikas C Baranwal, L. M. MacGregor, M. C. Sinha, Anna C. Maxey, Yang Su
article en

Abstract

Marine controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) surveys have been proven to be an effective tool in hydrocarbon exploration, principally due to the method’s ability (in the right circumstances) to identify electrical resistivity contrasts between hydrocarbon-saturated and brine-saturated sedimentary units. However, the sensitivity of such surveys decreases in shallow water, for deeper targets, and for targets with limited horizontal extent. In principle, the resolution and sensitivity of a survey can be improved by moving either the transmitting or the receiving dipoles into the sub-surface. We have therefore investigated the sensitivity of Seafloor to Borehole CSEM (sbCSEM) survey geometries, specifically for the case of simplified targets with small lateral dimensions in shallow water areas—including targets whose depth of burial substantially exceeds their lateral extent. The results are encouraging. Neither small target size nor shallow water presents obstacles in principle to the use of this approach. Our models reveal distinct lobes in the patterns of electric field and current density amplitudes around a sub-seafloor transmitting dipole. The shape, positions and amplitudes of these lobes are all strongly modified by the presence of one or more small resistive targets, and they are strongly influenced by the positions of target edges. These effects significantly modify the pattern of electric fields at the seafloor and hence result in good sensitivity for realistic survey geometries. Small targets can be detected by seafloor receivers when the sub-seafloor transmitting dipole is located at some distance laterally outside the targets—leading to potential applications in ‘step-out’ prospecting. The asymmetry of responses at the seafloor from targets that are offset with respect to transmitter location has potential applications in field appraisal, while monitoring of reservoirs during production provides another possible application. Varying the depth of the transmitter down the borehole generates a Vertical EM Profiling (VEMP) survey—analogous to Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP)—and we demonstrate that this too can have useful applications. Modelling for deeper (3 km sub-seafloor) targets continues to yield encouraging results and suggests that step-out sbCSEM may be effective at depths beyond the detection limit of conventional seafloor–seafloor CSEM.

GeosciencesVol. 16(5)
Geological Survey of Norway (NO), Jilin University (CN), National Oceanography Centre (GB), Fountainbridge Library (GB), Raptamer Discovery Group (United States) (US), University of Southampton (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.