Quantifying Emotional Responses to Traditional and Modern Architecture: The Case of US Federal Buildings

Current biometric tools, with facial expression analysis capabilities, enable us to more deeply examine affective correlates of exposure to architectural forms, especially when combined with eye-tracking and preference data. This study builds on earlier preference studies comparing seven pairs of traditional vs. modern civic buildings from the National Civic Art Society and an eye-tracking study with the same images from the Human Architecture and Planning Institute. It explores how metrics for engagement and positive emotional experience are correlated with exposure to traditional and modern forms. In agreement with other eye-tracking studies, as well as with the broader literature, the results indicate that traditional stimuli elicit positive affective responses, while modern stimuli result in negative responses across participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16094406
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Emotional Responses to Traditional and Modern Architecture: The Case of US Federal Buildings

Ann Sussman, Alexandros Α. Lavdas
Applied Sciences
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

Quantifying Emotional Responses to Traditional and Modern Architecture: The Case of US Federal Buildings

Ann Sussman, Alexandros Α. Lavdas
article en

Abstract

Current biometric tools, with facial expression analysis capabilities, enable us to more deeply examine affective correlates of exposure to architectural forms, especially when combined with eye-tracking and preference data. This study builds on earlier preference studies comparing seven pairs of traditional vs. modern civic buildings from the National Civic Art Society and an eye-tracking study with the same images from the Human Architecture and Planning Institute. It explores how metrics for engagement and positive emotional experience are correlated with exposure to traditional and modern forms. In agreement with other eye-tracking studies, as well as with the broader literature, the results indicate that traditional stimuli elicit positive affective responses, while modern stimuli result in negative responses across participants.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(9)
Institute for Biomedicine (IT), Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying Emotional Responses to Traditional and Modern Architecture: The Case of US Federal Buildings — Ann Sussman, Alexandros Α. Lavdas · Applied Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS