Simulation and Cost-Guided Fuel Treatment Planning for Prescribed-Fire Containment

Prescribed fires can reduce hazardous fuel loads, but planning remains challenging in landscapes with complex terrain, mixed vegetation, and nearby infrastructure. Predicting and controlling where a prescribed fire may breach its containment lines can be carried out by integrating fire-behavior simulations with practical treatment planning. This paper presents a two-stage framework using QUIC-Fire to identify high-risk escape zones and allocate containment treatments under cost and resource constraints. Stage 1 identifies high-risk boundary segments and assigns adjacent zones to fuel removal or moisture treatment to limit simulated fire spread beyond the control line. Stage 2 refines these assignments by incorporating treatment costs and penalty values near infrastructure to evaluate resource-constrained alternatives. Applied to a 14.2-ha prescribed-fire unit in Mount Laguna, California, the optimized Stage 2 configuration maintained containment under the simulated conditions while reducing total implementation cost from USD 97,319 to USD 95,266 (approximately 2.1%) and reducing fire-engine demand from six to three. These results illustrate how cost-aware treatment reallocation can improve resource efficiency for prescribed-fire performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9050187
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation and Cost-Guided Fuel Treatment Planning for Prescribed-Fire Containment

İlkay Altıntaş, Yeshvant Matey, Raymond de de Callafon
Fire
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Simulation and Cost-Guided Fuel Treatment Planning for Prescribed-Fire Containment

İlkay Altıntaş, Yeshvant Matey, Raymond de de Callafon
article en

Abstract

Prescribed fires can reduce hazardous fuel loads, but planning remains challenging in landscapes with complex terrain, mixed vegetation, and nearby infrastructure. Predicting and controlling where a prescribed fire may breach its containment lines can be carried out by integrating fire-behavior simulations with practical treatment planning. This paper presents a two-stage framework using QUIC-Fire to identify high-risk escape zones and allocate containment treatments under cost and resource constraints. Stage 1 identifies high-risk boundary segments and assigns adjacent zones to fuel removal or moisture treatment to limit simulated fire spread beyond the control line. Stage 2 refines these assignments by incorporating treatment costs and penalty values near infrastructure to evaluate resource-constrained alternatives. Applied to a 14.2-ha prescribed-fire unit in Mount Laguna, California, the optimized Stage 2 configuration maintained containment under the simulated conditions while reducing total implementation cost from USD 97,319 to USD 95,266 (approximately 2.1%) and reducing fire-engine demand from six to three. These results illustrate how cost-aware treatment reallocation can improve resource efficiency for prescribed-fire performance.

FireVol. 9(5)
University of San Diego (US), San Diego Supercomputer Center (US), University of California San Diego (US)
National Science Foundation
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Simulation and Cost-Guided Fuel Treatment Planning for Prescribed-Fire Containment — İlkay Altıntaş, Yeshvant Matey, et al. · Fire (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS