Cost-effectiveness of community-based interventions for reducing opioid overdose and non-overdose deaths: simulation modeling of HEALing Communities Study

Background: The opioid overdose crisis remains a public health emergency in the United States. Evidence-based practices-including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and naloxone distribution-can reduce harms, but their community-level cost-effectiveness is uncertain and may vary locally. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced community-level implementation of evidence-based practices for opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods: We used a validated microsimulation model of OUD, calibrated with data from the HEALing Communities Study across 26 highly impacted communities in Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. Six intervention scenarios for 2025-2030: maintaining 2024 evidence-based practice levels (status quo); improved naloxone distribution; improved MOUD retention; improved MOUD initiation; combined initiation and retention; and combined initiation, retention, and naloxone distribution. Outcomes included opioid overdose deaths (OODs), non-overdose opioid-related deaths, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (healthcare and societal), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Findings: Maintaining 2024 evidence-based practice levels was projected to yield OODs of 39-468 per 100,000 and non-overdose deaths of 238-3018 per 100,000 across communities. Enhancing MOUD initiation, retention, and naloxone distribution reduced OODs by 15-40% and non-overdose deaths by 7-24%, producing the largest QALY gains (1006-38,292). From the healthcare perspective, improved initiation plus retention was cost-effective in all communities (ICER US$11,765-US$91,058 per QALY); from the societal perspective, all enhanced scenarios were cost-saving (US$121 million-US$4.74 billion net savings). Interpretation: Community-level enhancement of MOUD initiation and retention, and for some communities also enhancing naloxone distribution, can substantially reduce opioid-related-overdose and non-overdose-deaths. These strategies are cost-effective from a healthcare perspective and cost-saving from a societal perspective, supporting investment in comprehensive, community-tailored interventions. Funding: NIH HEAL Initiative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2026.101480
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of community-based interventions for reducing opioid overdose and non-overdose deaths: simulation modeling of HEALing Communities Study

Joshua A. Barocas, Ayaz Hyder, Charles Knott, Carolina Barbosa et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Cost-effectiveness of community-based interventions for reducing opioid overdose and non-overdose deaths: simulation modeling of HEALing Communities Study

Joshua A. Barocas, Ayaz Hyder, Charles Knott, Carolina Barbosa, Jennifer Villani, Jagpreet Chhatwal, Amy B. Knudsen, Jeffrey H. Samet, Lisa Frazier, Eric E. Seiber, Bruce R. Schackman, Laura E. Starbird, Mert Sahinkoc, Sara Roberts, Jade Xiao, Katherine M. Keyes, William Dowd, Naleef Fareed, Qiushi Chen, Emmanuel Oga, Gary A. Zarkin, Marc LaRochelle, Benjamin P. Linas, Arnie Aldridge, Magdalena Cerdá
article en

Abstract

Background: The opioid overdose crisis remains a public health emergency in the United States. Evidence-based practices-including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and naloxone distribution-can reduce harms, but their community-level cost-effectiveness is uncertain and may vary locally. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enhanced community-level implementation of evidence-based practices for opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods: We used a validated microsimulation model of OUD, calibrated with data from the HEALing Communities Study across 26 highly impacted communities in Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. Six intervention scenarios for 2025-2030: maintaining 2024 evidence-based practice levels (status quo); improved naloxone distribution; improved MOUD retention; improved MOUD initiation; combined initiation and retention; and combined initiation, retention, and naloxone distribution. Outcomes included opioid overdose deaths (OODs), non-overdose opioid-related deaths, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (healthcare and societal), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Findings: Maintaining 2024 evidence-based practice levels was projected to yield OODs of 39-468 per 100,000 and non-overdose deaths of 238-3018 per 100,000 across communities. Enhancing MOUD initiation, retention, and naloxone distribution reduced OODs by 15-40% and non-overdose deaths by 7-24%, producing the largest QALY gains (1006-38,292). From the healthcare perspective, improved initiation plus retention was cost-effective in all communities (ICER US$11,765-US$91,058 per QALY); from the societal perspective, all enhanced scenarios were cost-saving (US$121 million-US$4.74 billion net savings). Interpretation: Community-level enhancement of MOUD initiation and retention, and for some communities also enhancing naloxone distribution, can substantially reduce opioid-related-overdose and non-overdose-deaths. These strategies are cost-effective from a healthcare perspective and cost-saving from a societal perspective, supporting investment in comprehensive, community-tailored interventions. Funding: NIH HEAL Initiative.

The Lancet Regional Health - AmericasVol. 59
Boston University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), National Institute on Drug Abuse (US), Harvard University (US), RTI International (US), Cornell University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University School (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), The Ohio State University (US), New York University (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), Columbia University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
National Institutes of Health, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.