Headless screw fixation versus fragment excision for hook of hamate fractures using a mini-carpal tunnel approach: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose: This retrospective cohort study compared the clinical outcomes of headless-screw open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and fragment excision for hook of hamate fractures performed through a mini-carpal tunnel approach. We evaluated radiographic union rates, functional recovery, and postoperative complications.Methods: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, 23 surgically treated patients (11 ORIF; 12 fragment excision) were included between January 2022 and February 2025. Data extracted from electronic health records included age, injury-to-surgery interval (ITS), pain measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), wrist range of motion (ROM), neuritic symptoms, and return-to-play (RTP) time. Outcomes were compared between the two operative groups using appropriate statistical analyses.Results: Patients in the ORIF group were younger (31.4±13.1 years vs. 42.6±19.7 years) and underwent surgery significantly earlier (ITS, 4.9±5.9 weeks vs. 31.1±29.5 weeks) than those in the excision group. ORIF achieved a radiographic consolidation rate of 90.9% (10/11 cases). Functional recovery outcomes—including mean RTP (6.27±1.19 weeks for ORIF vs. 5.50±0.90 weeks for excision; Welch p=0.10), pain (VAS, 1.82±1.25 vs. 1.67±1.15; p=0.73), and near-symmetric wrist ROM—were comparable between groups. The mini-open approach allowed direct visualization of the fracture site and was associated with low complication rates and an absence of neuritic symptoms in the ORIF cohort.Conclusion: Headless-screw ORIF performed through a mini-carpal tunnel approach achieved high union rates and functional outcomes comparable to fragment excision while preserving native carpal biomechanics. Despite baseline differences between groups, these findings suggest that headless screw ORIF is a feasible structure-sparing option with outcomes comparable to fragment excision in this small cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Hand and Microsurgery
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12790/ahm.25.0045
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Headless screw fixation versus fragment excision for hook of hamate fractures using a mini-carpal tunnel approach: a retrospective cohort study

B S Lee, Jae-Won Kim, Soonwon Chung
Archives of Hand and Microsurgery
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Headless screw fixation versus fragment excision for hook of hamate fractures using a mini-carpal tunnel approach: a retrospective cohort study

B S Lee, Jae-Won Kim, Soonwon Chung
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective cohort study compared the clinical outcomes of headless-screw open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and fragment excision for hook of hamate fractures performed through a mini-carpal tunnel approach. We evaluated radiographic union rates, functional recovery, and postoperative complications.Methods: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, 23 surgically treated patients (11 ORIF; 12 fragment excision) were included between January 2022 and February 2025. Data extracted from electronic health records included age, injury-to-surgery interval (ITS), pain measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), wrist range of motion (ROM), neuritic symptoms, and return-to-play (RTP) time. Outcomes were compared between the two operative groups using appropriate statistical analyses.Results: Patients in the ORIF group were younger (31.4±13.1 years vs. 42.6±19.7 years) and underwent surgery significantly earlier (ITS, 4.9±5.9 weeks vs. 31.1±29.5 weeks) than those in the excision group. ORIF achieved a radiographic consolidation rate of 90.9% (10/11 cases). Functional recovery outcomes—including mean RTP (6.27±1.19 weeks for ORIF vs. 5.50±0.90 weeks for excision; Welch p=0.10), pain (VAS, 1.82±1.25 vs. 1.67±1.15; p=0.73), and near-symmetric wrist ROM—were comparable between groups. The mini-open approach allowed direct visualization of the fracture site and was associated with low complication rates and an absence of neuritic symptoms in the ORIF cohort.Conclusion: Headless-screw ORIF performed through a mini-carpal tunnel approach achieved high union rates and functional outcomes comparable to fragment excision while preserving native carpal biomechanics. Despite baseline differences between groups, these findings suggest that headless screw ORIF is a feasible structure-sparing option with outcomes comparable to fragment excision in this small cohort.

Archives of Hand and Microsurgery
Jeonju University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.