Detecting Features of Interpersonal Difficulties in First-Person Accounts of Schizophrenia; Automated Linguistic and Network Analyses

Abstract Background First-person accounts (FPAs) provide multi-faceted insights into the lived social experiences of schizophrenia. We examined FPAs and third-person accounts (TPAs) using automated linguistic and network analyses to extract narrative patterns in relation to interpersonal difficulties. Study Design Narratives from 279 articles published in Schizophrenia Bulletin (1979-2025) were screened to identify 133 FPAs and 44 TPAs. Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ) was used to assess syndromes of schizotypy expressed in the narratives. At least one cognitive-perceptual syndrome (ideas of reference, odd beliefs, magical thinking) was detected in every FPA (n=133). Interpersonal difficulties (social anxiety, no close friends, constricted affect) were detected in 56 FPAs and designated as the “interpersonal difficulties” group. We used the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software (LIWC) to extract interpersonally relevant features: authenticity, emotional tone, pronoun use, social behavior, and confidence. Linguistic features of narratives in FPAs with and without interpersonal difficulties were compared using network analysis. Results Greater authenticity and lower confidence were detected in FPAs compared to TPAs. FPAs contained fewer social words and more “I” words than TPAs. FPAs with interpersonal difficulties were longer, more negative, and less linguistically formal than FPAs without interpersonal difficulties. Network analysis indicated a link between interpersonal difficulties and "voices.” Conclusions Narratives categorized by interpersonal difficulties exhibit distinct linguistic signatures revealed through automated linguistic tools and network analyses. Despite the vast range of topics in FPAs, these computational methods provide a robust quantitative framework for validating the lived experience of negative syndrome in schizotypy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgag017
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Features of Interpersonal Difficulties in First-Person Accounts of Schizophrenia; Automated Linguistic and Network Analyses

M LI, Katrina Rbeiz, Hyeon-Seung Lee, Pietra Bruni et al.
Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Detecting Features of Interpersonal Difficulties in First-Person Accounts of Schizophrenia; Automated Linguistic and Network Analyses

M LI, Katrina Rbeiz, Hyeon-Seung Lee, Pietra Bruni, Yunlai Gui, Michael Sangimino, James Yang, Olivia Jelsma, Tatiana Baxter, Mincheol Brian Kim, Sohee Park, Katie Babbitt, Anne Felsenheimer, Adi Peres
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background First-person accounts (FPAs) provide multi-faceted insights into the lived social experiences of schizophrenia. We examined FPAs and third-person accounts (TPAs) using automated linguistic and network analyses to extract narrative patterns in relation to interpersonal difficulties. Study Design Narratives from 279 articles published in Schizophrenia Bulletin (1979-2025) were screened to identify 133 FPAs and 44 TPAs. Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ) was used to assess syndromes of schizotypy expressed in the narratives. At least one cognitive-perceptual syndrome (ideas of reference, odd beliefs, magical thinking) was detected in every FPA (n=133). Interpersonal difficulties (social anxiety, no close friends, constricted affect) were detected in 56 FPAs and designated as the “interpersonal difficulties” group. We used the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software (LIWC) to extract interpersonally relevant features: authenticity, emotional tone, pronoun use, social behavior, and confidence. Linguistic features of narratives in FPAs with and without interpersonal difficulties were compared using network analysis. Results Greater authenticity and lower confidence were detected in FPAs compared to TPAs. FPAs contained fewer social words and more “I” words than TPAs. FPAs with interpersonal difficulties were longer, more negative, and less linguistically formal than FPAs without interpersonal difficulties. Network analysis indicated a link between interpersonal difficulties and "voices.” Conclusions Narratives categorized by interpersonal difficulties exhibit distinct linguistic signatures revealed through automated linguistic tools and network analyses. Despite the vast range of topics in FPAs, these computational methods provide a robust quantitative framework for validating the lived experience of negative syndrome in schizotypy.

Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
Vanderbilt University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.