Expectations Versus Reality: Self-Sourced and Managed Abortion Experiences of Miscarriage + Abortion Hotline Callers [ID 1203]

INTRODUCTION: Independent reproductive health navigation, including self-sourcing/managing abortions (SMA), has become more common post- Dobbs . We know SMA is used for diverse reasons, including barriers, privacy, and preference, but little is known about how individuals’ expectations compare to their realities of SMA. By engaging with callers from the Miscarriage + Abortion (M+A) Hotline—a clinician-run service offering evidence-based reproductive health information—we aim to understand these discrepancies. METHODS: We interviewed M+A Hotline callers from June to December 2024 in-depth about their SMA experiences. We analyzed interview transcripts using inductive and deductive codes and completed thematic analysis on the inductive code “Expectations vs. Reality of SMA Experience.” RESULTS: Most participants contacted the M+A Hotline to resolve the dissonance between their SMA expectations and lived experiences. These concerns included the following: anticipating “period-like” manifestations, but undergoing more intense cramping/bleeding; having a later-than-predicted onset of bleeding, causing anxiety about medication success; feeling unprepared to visualize pregnancy tissue; and experiencing longer-than-expected physical/emotional effects. M+A Hotline clinicians normalized callers’ symptoms, provided resources to improve expectation-setting, offered space for emotional processing, and informed callers of signs to seek in-person care, which overwhelmingly left callers feeling “reassured” and “supported.” CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: People who use SMA, despite having decreased initial health care contact, often seek clinician guidance and benefit from receiving accurate information and normalization of their experiences. Physicians in formal clinical settings will encounter this population and can inform their understanding of SMA expectations and embody the counseling modeled by the M+A Hotline to better mitigate anxieties around the realities of SMA use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006265.10
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expectations Versus Reality: Self-Sourced and Managed Abortion Experiences of Miscarriage + Abortion Hotline Callers [ID 1203]

Emma Chew Murphy, Juliana Novaes, Jennifer Karlin
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Expectations Versus Reality: Self-Sourced and Managed Abortion Experiences of Miscarriage + Abortion Hotline Callers [ID 1203]

Emma Chew Murphy, Juliana Novaes, Jennifer Karlin
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Independent reproductive health navigation, including self-sourcing/managing abortions (SMA), has become more common post- Dobbs . We know SMA is used for diverse reasons, including barriers, privacy, and preference, but little is known about how individuals’ expectations compare to their realities of SMA. By engaging with callers from the Miscarriage + Abortion (M+A) Hotline—a clinician-run service offering evidence-based reproductive health information—we aim to understand these discrepancies. METHODS: We interviewed M+A Hotline callers from June to December 2024 in-depth about their SMA experiences. We analyzed interview transcripts using inductive and deductive codes and completed thematic analysis on the inductive code “Expectations vs. Reality of SMA Experience.” RESULTS: Most participants contacted the M+A Hotline to resolve the dissonance between their SMA expectations and lived experiences. These concerns included the following: anticipating “period-like” manifestations, but undergoing more intense cramping/bleeding; having a later-than-predicted onset of bleeding, causing anxiety about medication success; feeling unprepared to visualize pregnancy tissue; and experiencing longer-than-expected physical/emotional effects. M+A Hotline clinicians normalized callers’ symptoms, provided resources to improve expectation-setting, offered space for emotional processing, and informed callers of signs to seek in-person care, which overwhelmingly left callers feeling “reassured” and “supported.” CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: People who use SMA, despite having decreased initial health care contact, often seek clinician guidance and benefit from receiving accurate information and normalization of their experiences. Physicians in formal clinical settings will encounter this population and can inform their understanding of SMA expectations and embody the counseling modeled by the M+A Hotline to better mitigate anxieties around the realities of SMA use.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 147(5S)
University of California, Davis (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.