Dissociated empathy and utilitarian moral judgment in borderline personality disorder

Abstract Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by affective instability, disrupted empathy, and self-processing. In this study, we aimed to investigate moral decision-making and its association with empathy in BPD compared to Control group (CG). 112 participants, 45 BPD, and 67 CG were recruited. They filled out a demographic questionnaire and completed the moral scenarios and Interpersonal Reactivity Index. We mainly used regression-based t-test, linear discriminant analysis, and canonical correlation analysis to analyze the data. Patients with BPD made more utilitarian decisions in all the moral scenarios (P-value < 0.05) and showed poorer perspective-taking , greater personal distress and fantasy (P-value < 0.05) with preserved empathic concern compared to CG. Morality, Empathy, and a combined Morality Empathy score had classification accuracies of 73%, 79%, and 84%, respectively, between BPD and CG groups.Canonical correlation analysis showed a significant association between moral and empathy scores’ spaces only in the BPD group. Most of empathy dimensions were significantly correlated only in the CG [empathic concern and personal distrress, and fantasy (P-value = 0.002 and < 0.001)]. The a typical structure of empathy in BPD may be related to differences in moral decision-making, reflected in increased utilitarian responses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-026-09475-x
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissociated empathy and utilitarian moral judgment in borderline personality disorder

Faraneh GhaffariHosseini, Mahziar Abarashi, Jordan Grafman, Seyed Vahid Shariat et al.
Current Psychology
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Dissociated empathy and utilitarian moral judgment in borderline personality disorder

Faraneh GhaffariHosseini, Mahziar Abarashi, Jordan Grafman, Seyed Vahid Shariat, Fatemeh Sadat Mirfazeli, MohammadAli Shokri, AmirHossein Memari, Ahmad Pirani, Kaveh Alavi, Abdolhossein Vahabie, Mohsen Alizadeh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by affective instability, disrupted empathy, and self-processing. In this study, we aimed to investigate moral decision-making and its association with empathy in BPD compared to Control group (CG). 112 participants, 45 BPD, and 67 CG were recruited. They filled out a demographic questionnaire and completed the moral scenarios and Interpersonal Reactivity Index. We mainly used regression-based t-test, linear discriminant analysis, and canonical correlation analysis to analyze the data. Patients with BPD made more utilitarian decisions in all the moral scenarios (P-value < 0.05) and showed poorer perspective-taking , greater personal distress and fantasy (P-value < 0.05) with preserved empathic concern compared to CG. Morality, Empathy, and a combined Morality Empathy score had classification accuracies of 73%, 79%, and 84%, respectively, between BPD and CG groups.Canonical correlation analysis showed a significant association between moral and empathy scores’ spaces only in the BPD group. Most of empathy dimensions were significantly correlated only in the CG [empathic concern and personal distrress, and fantasy (P-value = 0.002 and < 0.001)]. The a typical structure of empathy in BPD may be related to differences in moral decision-making, reflected in increased utilitarian responses.

Current PsychologyVol. 45(9)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.