“It’s Less Scary Now”: Undergraduate Students’ Experiences and the Development of Writing Self-Efficacy in a Writing-Intensive Course

Writing-intensive courses help undergraduate students develop disciplinary knowledge and communication skills, yet many students, particularly first-generation college students and those writing in a second language, enter these courses with low confidence and high writing anxiety. Writing self-efficacy, or students’ beliefs about their ability to succeed as writers, is associated with motivation and academic success, but less is known about how instructional practices shape its development. This qualitative study examined how students experienced instructional practices in a writing-intensive public health course and how these experiences influenced writing self-efficacy. Data were collected through a focus group with six undergraduate students and analyzed using a deductive thematic approach guided by Bandura’s four sources of self-efficacy. Students identified scaffolded assignments, opportunities for revision, and explanatory feedback as key facilitators of writing self-efficacy. Supportive classroom relationships, including proactive instructor outreach and consistent feedback, also appeared to foster confidence. Barriers included linguistic challenges, limited academic role models, and negative experiences with writing support services. These findings suggest writing self-efficacy may develop through the interaction of structured instructional practices and supportive classroom environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050716
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It’s Less Scary Now”: Undergraduate Students’ Experiences and the Development of Writing Self-Efficacy in a Writing-Intensive Course

Kimberly Arellano Carmona, Lindsay Crawford, Shweta Srinivasan
Education Sciences
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

“It’s Less Scary Now”: Undergraduate Students’ Experiences and the Development of Writing Self-Efficacy in a Writing-Intensive Course

Kimberly Arellano Carmona, Lindsay Crawford, Shweta Srinivasan
article en

Abstract

Writing-intensive courses help undergraduate students develop disciplinary knowledge and communication skills, yet many students, particularly first-generation college students and those writing in a second language, enter these courses with low confidence and high writing anxiety. Writing self-efficacy, or students’ beliefs about their ability to succeed as writers, is associated with motivation and academic success, but less is known about how instructional practices shape its development. This qualitative study examined how students experienced instructional practices in a writing-intensive public health course and how these experiences influenced writing self-efficacy. Data were collected through a focus group with six undergraduate students and analyzed using a deductive thematic approach guided by Bandura’s four sources of self-efficacy. Students identified scaffolded assignments, opportunities for revision, and explanatory feedback as key facilitators of writing self-efficacy. Supportive classroom relationships, including proactive instructor outreach and consistent feedback, also appeared to foster confidence. Barriers included linguistic challenges, limited academic role models, and negative experiences with writing support services. These findings suggest writing self-efficacy may develop through the interaction of structured instructional practices and supportive classroom environments.

Education SciencesVol. 16(5)
University of California, Merced (US), Bakersfield College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.