Usefulness of the Risk Management Plan (RMP) Pocket Edition in Pharmacists’ Practice in Community Pharmacies: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Risk management plan (RMP) utilization in clinical settings has been reported to be insufficient, particularly in community pharmacies. To facilitate the utilization of RMPs in pharmacists' practice, we created an "RMP Pocket Edition" by summarizing the RMPs. This exploratory study conducted a questionnaire survey to evaluate the usefulness of the RMP Pocket Edition in pharmacists' practice in community pharmacies within Iwate Prefecture. This study targeted managing pharmacists from 89 community pharmacies who intended to use the RMP Pocket Edition. Responses to specific survey items were measured using a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Of the 89 pharmacies, 56 responded (response rate: 62.9%), and 40 of them utilized the RMP Pocket Edition. The RMP Pocket Edition was most commonly utilized to check patient materials during counseling, assess drug risks while dispensing new medications, and for personal study. All median scores for the pocket book's perceived usefulness across various aspects of pharmacists' practice, including the understanding of RMPs, the identification of adverse drug reactions, and the facilitation of RMP utilization, were 4 or higher on a five-point scale. Further, the median score for the intention to continue utilizing the RMP Pocket Edition in the future was 5 (interquartile range, 4-5). In conclusion, the findings suggest that the RMP Pocket Edition contributes to facilitating the utilization of RMPs in pharmacists' practice in community pharmacies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
YAKUGAKU ZASSHI
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.25-00149
Primary Topic
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usefulness of the Risk Management Plan (RMP) Pocket Edition in Pharmacists’ Practice in Community Pharmacies: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Takashi Omoto, Manato Inagaki, JUNICHI ASAKA, Kenzo Kudo
YAKUGAKU ZASSHI
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
article

Usefulness of the Risk Management Plan (RMP) Pocket Edition in Pharmacists’ Practice in Community Pharmacies: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Takashi Omoto, Manato Inagaki, JUNICHI ASAKA, Kenzo Kudo
article en

Abstract

Risk management plan (RMP) utilization in clinical settings has been reported to be insufficient, particularly in community pharmacies. To facilitate the utilization of RMPs in pharmacists' practice, we created an "RMP Pocket Edition" by summarizing the RMPs. This exploratory study conducted a questionnaire survey to evaluate the usefulness of the RMP Pocket Edition in pharmacists' practice in community pharmacies within Iwate Prefecture. This study targeted managing pharmacists from 89 community pharmacies who intended to use the RMP Pocket Edition. Responses to specific survey items were measured using a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Of the 89 pharmacies, 56 responded (response rate: 62.9%), and 40 of them utilized the RMP Pocket Edition. The RMP Pocket Edition was most commonly utilized to check patient materials during counseling, assess drug risks while dispensing new medications, and for personal study. All median scores for the pocket book's perceived usefulness across various aspects of pharmacists' practice, including the understanding of RMPs, the identification of adverse drug reactions, and the facilitation of RMP utilization, were 4 or higher on a five-point scale. Further, the median score for the intention to continue utilizing the RMP Pocket Edition in the future was 5 (interquartile range, 4-5). In conclusion, the findings suggest that the RMP Pocket Edition contributes to facilitating the utilization of RMPs in pharmacists' practice in community pharmacies.

YAKUGAKU ZASSHIVol. 146(5)
Iwate Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.