Understanding Maternal Ambivalence Across Cultures: Psychometric Validation of the Maternal Ambivalence Scale in Colombia and Comparison With Spain

Background: Maternal ambivalence, defined as the coexistence of conflicting feelings toward motherhood, is a culturally embedded experience closely linked to perinatal mental health. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Maternal Ambivalence Scale (MAS) in Colombian women and compared maternal ambivalence and psychological adjustment between Colombian and Spanish perinatal samples. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey included 456 Colombian women (mean [M] = 27.5, standard deviation [SD] = 6.1; range = 18–48 years; 296 pregnant, 160 postpartum). Participants completed the MAS, the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS), and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in R (lavaan, semTools) tested the three-factor model (Doubts, Rejection, Suppression) with robust maximum likelihood estimation (MLR). Measurement invariance was evaluated across the perinatal stage and country. Nonparametric analyses (Spearman’s ρ, Mann-Whitney U) were performed in SPSS v27.0. Results: The MAS showed excellent fit, χ2(74) = 143.71, p < 0.001; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.968; Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.960; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.050, 90% confidence interval (CI) [0.037, 0.062]; α = 0.80–0.84. Measurement invariance across the perinatal stage was supported (configural, metric, scalar), and partial scalar invariance was achieved across countries. Higher Doubts and Rejection were correlated with depression (ρ = 0.50, 0.40), anxiety (ρ = 0.42, 0.28), and lower life satisfaction (ρ = –0.48, –0.56; all p < 0.001). Colombian women reported higher ambivalence and poorer well-being than Spanish women. Conclusions: The MAS demonstrated strong reliability, validity, and cross-cultural relevance, supporting its use in culturally sensitive perinatal mental health assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/bp46875
Primary Topic
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Maternal Ambivalence Across Cultures: Psychometric Validation of the Maternal Ambivalence Scale in Colombia and Comparison With Spain

Carlos Suso-Ribera, Juana María Bretón-López, Ana Goterris-Estrada, Ana María Carrillo-Rosales et al.
Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
article

Understanding Maternal Ambivalence Across Cultures: Psychometric Validation of the Maternal Ambivalence Scale in Colombia and Comparison With Spain

Carlos Suso-Ribera, Juana María Bretón-López, Ana Goterris-Estrada, Ana María Carrillo-Rosales, Magdalena B. Martín-Sánchez
article en

Abstract

Background: Maternal ambivalence, defined as the coexistence of conflicting feelings toward motherhood, is a culturally embedded experience closely linked to perinatal mental health. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Maternal Ambivalence Scale (MAS) in Colombian women and compared maternal ambivalence and psychological adjustment between Colombian and Spanish perinatal samples. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey included 456 Colombian women (mean [M] = 27.5, standard deviation [SD] = 6.1; range = 18–48 years; 296 pregnant, 160 postpartum). Participants completed the MAS, the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS), and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in R (lavaan, semTools) tested the three-factor model (Doubts, Rejection, Suppression) with robust maximum likelihood estimation (MLR). Measurement invariance was evaluated across the perinatal stage and country. Nonparametric analyses (Spearman’s ρ, Mann-Whitney U) were performed in SPSS v27.0. Results: The MAS showed excellent fit, χ2(74) = 143.71, p < 0.001; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.968; Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.960; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.050, 90% confidence interval (CI) [0.037, 0.062]; α = 0.80–0.84. Measurement invariance across the perinatal stage was supported (configural, metric, scalar), and partial scalar invariance was achieved across countries. Higher Doubts and Rejection were correlated with depression (ρ = 0.50, 0.40), anxiety (ρ = 0.42, 0.28), and lower life satisfaction (ρ = –0.48, –0.56; all p < 0.001). Colombian women reported higher ambivalence and poorer well-being than Spanish women. Conclusions: The MAS demonstrated strong reliability, validity, and cross-cultural relevance, supporting its use in culturally sensitive perinatal mental health assessment.

Behavioral Psychology/Psicología ConductualVol. 34(2)
Universitat Jaume I (ES), Hebron University (PS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (ES), Ação Educativa (BR), Universidad Europea (MX), Ayuntamiento de Castellón de la Plana (ES), Clínica Santa María (CO), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Universidad Europea de Canarias (ES)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.