Beware the algorithm: a scoping review of predictive analytics in children’s social care

Predictive analytics are increasingly embedded in children’s social care, often without adequate scrutiny of their assumptions, accuracy or social consequences. While racialised harms from criminal justice algorithms are well documented in the US, concerns in social work remain underexplored. Models trained on data from unequal systems risk reproducing or intensifying existing social gradients. This scoping review maps empirical research on predictive analytics in children’s services. From 5,393 records, 37 studies meet the inclusion criteria. Using O’Neil’s framework of opacity, scale and damage, we examine how algorithms are developed, operationalised and reported. Interest is growing in using predictive tools for resource allocation, service design, risk screening and decision support. However, most models lack transparency, provide limited information on development or error rates, and rarely examine algorithmic bias or the harms of false positives. Many studies anticipate rapid scale-up using linked data sets, raising significant concerns about governance, consent and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical and Radical Social Work
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/20498608y2026d000000128
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beware the algorithm: a scoping review of predictive analytics in children’s social care

Victoria Knowles, Charlotte Ashworth, Nick R. Burke
Critical and Radical Social Work
Social Work Education and Practice
article

Beware the algorithm: a scoping review of predictive analytics in children’s social care

Victoria Knowles, Charlotte Ashworth, Nick R. Burke
article en

Abstract

Predictive analytics are increasingly embedded in children’s social care, often without adequate scrutiny of their assumptions, accuracy or social consequences. While racialised harms from criminal justice algorithms are well documented in the US, concerns in social work remain underexplored. Models trained on data from unequal systems risk reproducing or intensifying existing social gradients. This scoping review maps empirical research on predictive analytics in children’s services. From 5,393 records, 37 studies meet the inclusion criteria. Using O’Neil’s framework of opacity, scale and damage, we examine how algorithms are developed, operationalised and reported. Interest is growing in using predictive tools for resource allocation, service design, risk screening and decision support. However, most models lack transparency, provide limited information on development or error rates, and rarely examine algorithmic bias or the harms of false positives. Many studies anticipate rapid scale-up using linked data sets, raising significant concerns about governance, consent and accountability.

Critical and Radical Social Work
Longley Park Sixth Form College (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.