Accuracy of Distal Internal Carotid Artery Contrast Ratio to Infer Proximal Carotid Disease in the Mobile Stroke Unit
BACKGROUND: Extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is a common cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Cervical computed tomography (CT) angiography can rapidly diagnose carotid pathology but is not possible with current-generation CT scanners used in mobile stroke units. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the intracranial ICA contrast density ratio (CDR) to identify extracranial ICA stenosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients at 3 comprehensive stroke centers in Melbourne, Victoria, who received CT angiography on the mobile stroke unit CereTom CT scanner, with reference standard in-hospital CT angiography or digital subtraction angiography in the Melbourne mobile stroke unit database. The mean Hounsfield units at 4 segments of the intracranial ICA, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the symptomatic hemisphere, were measured. The CDR was calculated using the formula: CDR=contralateral mean Hounsfield units/ipsilateral Hounsfield units. Statistical analysis was completed with univariate analysis of CDR, and leave-one-out cross-validation with receiver operating characteristic area under the curve to determine CDR thresholds associated with stenosis or occlusion, to determine sensitivity and specificity of the test. RESULTS: Of 151 patients included, 31 of 151 (20.5%) had extracranial ICA stenosis >50%, and the average CDR was higher in patients with >70% stenosis with threshold ratio of >1.24 (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 88%; positive predictive value, 57%; and negative predictive value, 96%) or extracranial occlusion (sensitivity, 100; specificity, 82%; positive predictive value, 29%; and negative predictive value, 100%). The threshold of 1.18 for 50% to 99% and carotid occlusion had lower sensitivity (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 95%; positive predictive value, 88%; and negative predictive value, 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the intracranial ICA CDR may assist in ruling out high-grade extracranial stenosis in patients who are being considered for direct transfer for endovascular thrombectomy after head-only CT angiography.
Authors
- Andrew Bivard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7762-5832)
- Francesca Langenberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-5332)
- Oshi Swarup (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4610-1803)
- Anna H. Balabanski
- Henry Zhao
- Vincent N. Thijs
- James L. Barker
- Peter J. Mitchell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8337-7529)
- Hannah T. Johns (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2135-0504)
- Bruce C.V. Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3632-9433)
- Stephen M. Davis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0962-2300)
- Cameron Williams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4952-8896)
- Leonid Churilov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9807-6606)
- Geoffrey A. Donnan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6324-3403)
- Bernard Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8802-9606)
Institutions
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU)
- Alfred Health (AU)
- Austin Health (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
- Published
- 2026-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.125.002260
- Primary Topic
- Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00