Accuracy of Distal Internal Carotid Artery Contrast Ratio to Infer Proximal Carotid Disease in the Mobile Stroke Unit

BACKGROUND: Extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is a common cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Cervical computed tomography (CT) angiography can rapidly diagnose carotid pathology but is not possible with current-generation CT scanners used in mobile stroke units. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the intracranial ICA contrast density ratio (CDR) to identify extracranial ICA stenosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients at 3 comprehensive stroke centers in Melbourne, Victoria, who received CT angiography on the mobile stroke unit CereTom CT scanner, with reference standard in-hospital CT angiography or digital subtraction angiography in the Melbourne mobile stroke unit database. The mean Hounsfield units at 4 segments of the intracranial ICA, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the symptomatic hemisphere, were measured. The CDR was calculated using the formula: CDR=contralateral mean Hounsfield units/ipsilateral Hounsfield units. Statistical analysis was completed with univariate analysis of CDR, and leave-one-out cross-validation with receiver operating characteristic area under the curve to determine CDR thresholds associated with stenosis or occlusion, to determine sensitivity and specificity of the test. RESULTS: Of 151 patients included, 31 of 151 (20.5%) had extracranial ICA stenosis >50%, and the average CDR was higher in patients with >70% stenosis with threshold ratio of >1.24 (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 88%; positive predictive value, 57%; and negative predictive value, 96%) or extracranial occlusion (sensitivity, 100; specificity, 82%; positive predictive value, 29%; and negative predictive value, 100%). The threshold of 1.18 for 50% to 99% and carotid occlusion had lower sensitivity (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 95%; positive predictive value, 88%; and negative predictive value, 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the intracranial ICA CDR may assist in ruling out high-grade extracranial stenosis in patients who are being considered for direct transfer for endovascular thrombectomy after head-only CT angiography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.125.002260
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Distal Internal Carotid Artery Contrast Ratio to Infer Proximal Carotid Disease in the Mobile Stroke Unit

Andrew Bivard, Francesca Langenberg, Oshi Swarup, Anna H. Balabanski et al.
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Accuracy of Distal Internal Carotid Artery Contrast Ratio to Infer Proximal Carotid Disease in the Mobile Stroke Unit

Andrew Bivard, Francesca Langenberg, Oshi Swarup, Anna H. Balabanski, Henry Zhao, Vincent N. Thijs, James L. Barker, Peter J. Mitchell, Hannah T. Johns, Bruce C.V. Campbell, Stephen M. Davis, Cameron Williams, Leonid Churilov, Geoffrey A. Donnan, Bernard Yan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is a common cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Cervical computed tomography (CT) angiography can rapidly diagnose carotid pathology but is not possible with current-generation CT scanners used in mobile stroke units. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the intracranial ICA contrast density ratio (CDR) to identify extracranial ICA stenosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients at 3 comprehensive stroke centers in Melbourne, Victoria, who received CT angiography on the mobile stroke unit CereTom CT scanner, with reference standard in-hospital CT angiography or digital subtraction angiography in the Melbourne mobile stroke unit database. The mean Hounsfield units at 4 segments of the intracranial ICA, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the symptomatic hemisphere, were measured. The CDR was calculated using the formula: CDR=contralateral mean Hounsfield units/ipsilateral Hounsfield units. Statistical analysis was completed with univariate analysis of CDR, and leave-one-out cross-validation with receiver operating characteristic area under the curve to determine CDR thresholds associated with stenosis or occlusion, to determine sensitivity and specificity of the test. RESULTS: Of 151 patients included, 31 of 151 (20.5%) had extracranial ICA stenosis >50%, and the average CDR was higher in patients with >70% stenosis with threshold ratio of >1.24 (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 88%; positive predictive value, 57%; and negative predictive value, 96%) or extracranial occlusion (sensitivity, 100; specificity, 82%; positive predictive value, 29%; and negative predictive value, 100%). The threshold of 1.18 for 50% to 99% and carotid occlusion had lower sensitivity (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 95%; positive predictive value, 88%; and negative predictive value, 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the intracranial ICA CDR may assist in ruling out high-grade extracranial stenosis in patients who are being considered for direct transfer for endovascular thrombectomy after head-only CT angiography.

Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Austin Health (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.