Comparisons of flow around the spaced and bundled pipes at various gap ratios and Reynolds numbers

This study numerically investigates the hydrodynamic characteristics of two piggyback pipeline configurations, spaced and bundled pipe system, over a Reynolds number range of Re = 40–150 and gap ratios of G* = 0.1–0.5. Three key findings emerge, with direct implications for offshore pipeline design and stability assessment. First, for the spaced configuration, the gap ratio fundamentally governs the flow regime: single-bluff-body behavior at small gaps transitions to separated flow with independent vortex streets at larger gaps. Within each regime, the Reynolds number modulates the drag coefficient, vortex-shedding modes (2S, 2P, and P + S), and the phase shifts in inter-pipe force fluctuations. A notable trend reversal is observed in the Strouhal number: at small gaps, St decreases with increasing Re, whereas at large gaps, St increases with Re. This reversal is attributed to the competing effects of gap-flow acceleration and shear-layer instability, which alter the vortex formation length in opposite ways depending on the gap ratio. Second, for the bundled configuration, the hydrodynamic response is governed by the interplay between geometric bias and shear-layer dynamics. The mean lift coefficient exhibits a non-monotonic variation with Re at G* = 0.3 and 0.5, peaking around Re = 100 before decreasing. This behavior reflects a competition between the geometric asymmetry, which imposes a persistent pressure imbalance, and the transition in vortex shedding modes (from 2S to 2P), which redistributes the time-averaged surface pressure. The drag coefficient increases monotonically with both Re and gap ratio, while the Strouhal number decreases systematically as the gap widens. Third, a comparative analysis reveals that at the smallest gap (G* = 0.1), both configurations exhibit similar hydrodynamic behavior, with the secondary pipe fully immersed in the main pipe's wake. As the gap increases, their responses diverge markedly: the spaced configuration transitions to independent vortex shedding from each pipe, while the bundled configuration maintains a single-bluff-body character but experiences periodic surface reattachment on the secondary pipe. This results in continuously increasing drag, significantly larger lift fluctuations, and a consistently lower vortex-shedding frequency. Collectively, these findings clarify the parametric dependencies and underlying mechanisms governing the hydrodynamic responses of the two piggyback configurations. The quantitative comparisons of force coefficients and Strouhal numbers provide a robust basis for configuration selection and fatigue life assessment in engineering design.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0323722
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparisons of flow around the spaced and bundled pipes at various gap ratios and Reynolds numbers

Jiawen Zhong, Cheng Zhang, Liang Cheng, Tao Tang
Physics of Fluids
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
article

Comparisons of flow around the spaced and bundled pipes at various gap ratios and Reynolds numbers

Jiawen Zhong, Cheng Zhang, Liang Cheng, Tao Tang
article en

Abstract

This study numerically investigates the hydrodynamic characteristics of two piggyback pipeline configurations, spaced and bundled pipe system, over a Reynolds number range of Re = 40–150 and gap ratios of G* = 0.1–0.5. Three key findings emerge, with direct implications for offshore pipeline design and stability assessment. First, for the spaced configuration, the gap ratio fundamentally governs the flow regime: single-bluff-body behavior at small gaps transitions to separated flow with independent vortex streets at larger gaps. Within each regime, the Reynolds number modulates the drag coefficient, vortex-shedding modes (2S, 2P, and P + S), and the phase shifts in inter-pipe force fluctuations. A notable trend reversal is observed in the Strouhal number: at small gaps, St decreases with increasing Re, whereas at large gaps, St increases with Re. This reversal is attributed to the competing effects of gap-flow acceleration and shear-layer instability, which alter the vortex formation length in opposite ways depending on the gap ratio. Second, for the bundled configuration, the hydrodynamic response is governed by the interplay between geometric bias and shear-layer dynamics. The mean lift coefficient exhibits a non-monotonic variation with Re at G* = 0.3 and 0.5, peaking around Re = 100 before decreasing. This behavior reflects a competition between the geometric asymmetry, which imposes a persistent pressure imbalance, and the transition in vortex shedding modes (from 2S to 2P), which redistributes the time-averaged surface pressure. The drag coefficient increases monotonically with both Re and gap ratio, while the Strouhal number decreases systematically as the gap widens. Third, a comparative analysis reveals that at the smallest gap (G* = 0.1), both configurations exhibit similar hydrodynamic behavior, with the secondary pipe fully immersed in the main pipe's wake. As the gap increases, their responses diverge markedly: the spaced configuration transitions to independent vortex shedding from each pipe, while the bundled configuration maintains a single-bluff-body character but experiences periodic surface reattachment on the secondary pipe. This results in continuously increasing drag, significantly larger lift fluctuations, and a consistently lower vortex-shedding frequency. Collectively, these findings clarify the parametric dependencies and underlying mechanisms governing the hydrodynamic responses of the two piggyback configurations. The quantitative comparisons of force coefficients and Strouhal numbers provide a robust basis for configuration selection and fatigue life assessment in engineering design.

Physics of FluidsVol. 38(5)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.